On 4th December 2025 the Donald Trump administration released the new National Security Strategy (NSS) of the United States of America. The document, which constitutes the primary roadmap of security and foreign policy, outlining national interests, addressing threats and defining strategic priorities, may provide some reference points for understanding Trump’s vision of international affairs. What are the key takeaways on Asia?
- Asia: a top priority after homeland
The new NSS hails Asia as the top US foreign policy priority. It is only preceded by the Western Hemisphere, which exerts direct impact on the US homeland security as the principal source of direct threats related to drugs and migration. NSS recognises Asia, also interchangeably referred to as the Indo-Pacific, as the central place in today’s global economic and geopolitical dynamics, stating that America’s domination there underpins prosperity “at home”. The document reiterates the US commitment to maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific, but it is clear this pledge must, in the first place, serve the US national interests, and cannot eclipse the goal of rebalancing trade relations in the US’ favour. America’s approach towards Asia is defined largely through the prism of economic interests, which can be identified as a central thread throughout the entire NSS.
- China: between economic competition and engagement
The NSS voices criticism of the previous administrations’ approach to China. It states that promoting its integration into the global economy has led to the current trade imbalance. The new strategy and its language signal a departure from former policy. While the previous Trump and Biden administrations positioned China as a political and military contender, eroding international order and American security, this NSS lacks the “great power competition” tone and frames Beijing mainly as an economic competitor. The 2025 NSS is the first since 1988 not addressing democracy or human rights issues. One of the main objectives of Trump’s Asia policy will certainly be to reconfigure the “unbalanced” economic relations with China, with decoupling in areas critical to national security, such as rare earth elements, as a key tenet. The NSS, however, leaves room for engagement with Beijing to “maintain genuinely mutually advantageous economic relationship”.
- Taiwan and the First Island Chain: deterrence
Besides reducing the current trade deficit with China, the US strategy in Asia will concentrate on deterring a conflict over Taiwan and other parts of the First Island Chain. In contrast to the previous documents, the new NSS does not explicitly mention the “one China” policy, just stating the US commitment to the “longstanding declaratory policy” of not supporting any unilateral changes to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait. The importance of preventing a conflict over the island, mentioned for the first time as a priority, stems from its semiconductor industry and strategic location, including its proximity to key sea lines of communication. There is a clear strategic focus on securing the First Island Chain, evidenced by four references to it – the first occurrence of such mentions in an NSS. The US aims to achieve this by maintaining a favourable balance of military power – here the document heralds close defence and military cooperation with allies, noting “the American military cannot, and should not have to, do this alone”. The new national strategy remains silent on North Korea, potentially implying a deprioritisation of the issue.
- Allies: defence build-ups and trade balance
The NSS mentions America’s network of alliances as one of the strategic assets, echoing the longstanding view that partnerships enhance US security. Trump’s administration stresses its willingness to develop them, but concurrently emphasises restraining free-riding and trade imbalances. The new NSS treats Asian allies in a softer way than the European partners, sparing them criticism about economic decline, censorship or “prospect of civilizational erasure”. Trump will, however, keep putting pressure on Asian allies and partners, including Japan, Australia, Taiwan and South Korea, to ramp up military expenditure and develop capabilities reinforcing regional deterrence. The NSS assigns partners in the Indo-Pacific a crucial role in curbing China’s economic influence, and even suggests that Trump may seek to integrate Asian allies into a unified economic bloc. The document mentions Australia, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Quad format (the US, Japan, India, Australia) and India, outlining the need for its greater contribution to Indo-Pacific security, but leaves out the Philippines and the AUKUS partnership (Australia, the UK, the US).
Jakub Witczak Project Coordinator at the Boym Institute. Student of international relations at the University of Warsaw. Member of the Forum of Young Diplomats and founder of the Student Association of Pacific Area States. Research areas include transatlantic security, international security in the Indo-Pacific, international military relations, security policy of Japan, Taiwan, Sino-American relations and history of Asia-Pacific.
Więcej informacji na temat: newslettera, polityki prywatności serwisu
czytaj więcej
The Boym Institute contribution to the Transcultural Caravan project
We are pleased to announce, that our analysts and contributors are among authors of the newest publication - "European Perspectives on the New Silk Roads – A Transcultural Approach".
Coronavirus and climate policies: long-term consequences of short-term initiatives
As large parts of the world are gradually becoming habituated to living in the shadow of the coronavirus pandemic, global attention has turned to restarting the economy. One of the most consequential impacts of these efforts will be that on our climate policies and environmental conditions.
Dawid JuraszekThe Adam Institute invites you to join us for a new engaging course, tailored to participants from Poland, taught on ZOOM.
The link between EU Aid and Good Governance in Central Asia
Nowadays all the CA states continue transitioning into the human-centered model of governance where the comprehensive needs of societies must be satisfied, nevertheless, the achievements are to a greater extent ambiguous.
At the Boym Institute we are coming out with new initiative: #WomeninBoym, which aims to show the activity of this – often less visible – half of society. We will write about what women think, say and do. We will also publicise what women are researching and writing.
Environmental problems transcend not only national borders but also historical periods. And yet debates on the necessary measures and timelines are often constrained by considerations of election cycles (or dynastic successions) in any given country.
Dawid JuraszekYoung Indo-Pacific: Forward-looking perspectives on the EU Indo-Pacific Strategy
The Boym Institute, working with other think tanks, organizes panel discussions on topics related to the European Union's Indo-Pacific strategy
“Green growth” may well be more of the same
Witnessing the recent flurry of political activity amid the accelerating environmental emergency, from the Green New Deal to the UN climate summits to European political initiatives, one could be forgiven for thinking that things are finally moving forward.
Dawid JuraszekThe unification of the two Koreas: an ASEAN perspective
The aim of the paper is to discuss the role of the ASEAN as a critical component of the solution to the Korean unification. The Korean Unification refers to the potential reunification of both Koreas into a single sovereign Korean state led by the leadership of the two Koreas.
Nicolas LeviHow to deal with gender-based segregation?
Interview on the project Supporting the Economic Empowerment of Afghan Women through Education and Training in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Magdalena Sobańska-Cwalina and Krzysztof M. Zalewski (The Boym Institute) in discussion with: Yakup Beris, Johannes Stenbaek Madsen, Maria Dotsenko, Gulnar Smailova,
Zespół Instytutu BoymaLiquidation of the Polish colony in Manchuria (north-eastern China)
Ms. Łucja Drabczak - A Polish woman born in Harbin, she spent her childhood in China. She returned to Poland at the age of 10. She is the author of the book 'China... Memories from my childhood'. She contacted us to convey special family memories related to leaving Manchuria in 1949.
Online Course: “Feminism and Democracy: a Deep Dive”
The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
Short summary of events at the Boym Institute
We want the Boym Institute to become a valuable platform of exchanging views, making valuable acquaintances and, above all, deepening knowledge. Therefore, we undertake the organization of many events: debates, lectures, and conferences.
Temples, Hackers, and Leaks: The Thai-Cambodian Crisis in the Age of Information Warfare
Thailand and Cambodia are caught up in a heated border dispute over an ancient temple that dates back to the 11th century. This isn’t just about land — it’s about the heritage of colonialism, national pride, and tensions between two powerful political dynasties.
Andżelika SerwatkaWorkshop – Liberalism vs authoritarianism: political ideas in Singapore and China
We cordially invite you to a workshop session “Liberalism vs authoritarianism: political ideas in Singapore and China”. The workshop is organized by Patrycja Pendrakowska and Maria Kądzielska at the Department of Philosophy, University of Warsaw on ZOOM.
Book review: “Europe – North Korea. Between Humanitarianism And Business?”
Book review of "Europe – North Korea. Between Humanitarianism And Business?", written by Myung-Kyu Park, Bernhard Seliger, Sung-Jo Park (Eds.) and published by Lit Verlag in 2010.
Nicolas LeviOnline Course: “Conflict Resolution and Democracy”
The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
Taiwanese Perceptions of Russia’s Ukraine war
Since the invasion of Ukraine, the Taiwanese government remained committed to its position of condemnation for Russia, humanitarian support for Ukraine, and deep appreciation and admiration for the Ukrainian people’s will to defy power, resist aggression, and defend their nation.
Kuan Ting ChenTo free oneself from the Chinese embrace. On Indo-Russian relations with Nandan Unnikrishnan
Interview with Nandan Unnikrishnan, who has served for many years as a correspondent for Indian media in Russia. Currently he is a research fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in Delhi. The interview was conducted during the Raisina Dialogue 2019 in Delhi.
Krzysztof ZalewskiA Story of Victory? The 30th Anniversary of Kazakh Statehood and Challenges for the Future.
On 25 May 2021, the Boym Institute, in cooperation with the Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, organised an international debate with former Polish President Aleksander Kwaśniewski (1995-2005).
Europe and the Consequences of China’s First Step on the Moon
Just a few years ago, it was assumed that the United States would almost automatically reclaim the lead in landing on the Moon. The original timeline envisioned Artemis III for 2024, but successive delays pushed the mission first to 2025–2026 and now to no earlier than mid-2027.
Kamil GolemoPolish-Asian Cooperation in the Field of New Technologies – Report
Polish and Polish-founded companies are already on the largest continent in sectors such as: IT, educational technology, finance, marketing, e-commerce and space. Despite this, the potential lying dormant in the domestic innovation sector seems to be underutilized.
Online Course: “Conflict Resolution and Democracy”
The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
Peace and development as the call of our day again face severe challenges on a global scale, with more prominent instability, uncertainty and complexity
Yiwei Wang