Articles

Invest and cooperate with Serbia or Poland? A dilemma for South Korean companies

This paper explains why Serbia may replace Poland as a strategic outsourcing centre for South Korean companies in Central and Southern Europe.

Instytut Boyma 20.10.2024

South Korea flag

South Korea (also referred to in this paper as the Republic of Korea – ROK) is Poland’s most important partner. Unfortunately, the number of South Korean projects realised in Poland tends to decrease as Polish authorities lose public tenders to regional competitors such as Hungary and Serbia. This paper explains why Serbia may replace Poland as a strategic outsourcing centre for South Korean companies in Central and Southern Europe.

In mid-March, the Serbian ambassador to South Korea indicated that Serbia could become a major food supplier to South Korea, citing the fact that almost thirty percent of the total amount of corn imported by Korea comes from his country. Moreover, Korea was seen as a potential model for Serbian economic reform. These are the qualifying words of the Serbian government and the current centrist leader, Aleksandar Vučić, who has led Serbia since May 2017. Innovation and technology are driving South Korea’s economic development, which is of particular interest to the Serbian leadership.

When assessing Belgrade’s dependence on Seoul, the role of South Korea in the Serbian economy cannot be underestimated. Between 2020 and 2021, bilateral trade increased by almost fifty percent, from EUR 250 million to EUR 370 million. Serbia’s imports from South Korea include electrical and electronic equipment and machinery, such as boilers and IT systems. This is due to the role of South Korean companies in the field of digitalisation and improvement of electronic services for public administration in Serbia.

By 2020, the value of Serbian exports to South Korea will be less than EUR 10 million. In 2021, Serbian exports will be multiplied by eleven through the export of ore slag and ash to South Korea for a value of almost EUR 110 million. South Korea represents one per cent of Serbia’s foreign trade, and Serbia accounts for less than half a per cent of South Korea’s exports.

Historical Background

Historically, South Korea established diplomatic relations with the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on 27 December 1989. The former Yugoslavia had close relations with North Korea. Until 1989, the former Yugoslavia maintained close relations with North Korea. Kim Pyong-il, the half-brother of Kim Jong-il, served as a military attaché at the North Korean embassy in the Serbian capital, Belgrade, from 1982 to 1984.

South Korean Foreign Minister Choe Ho-jung visited Yugoslavia in March 1990. Yugoslav President Borisav Jović visited South Korea and signed an air transport agreement in November of the same year. Meanwhile, Serbia and South Korea opened resident embassies in February 1990. Despite the dissolution of Yugoslavia in April 1992, relations between the two countries continued, although to a lesser extent due to the unstable situation in the Balkan region. Institutionally, these two European countries also maintain their respective embassies. Since 2015, there is also an office of the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency (KOTRA) in Belgrade. KOTRA contributes to and aims to develop bilateral relations between South Korea and Serbia.

Economic Cooperation

Until 2014, the two countries lacked meaningful cooperation due to the ongoing civil war in this European region, which remains unresolved as of January 2023. The situation changed in the mid-2010s when the Serbian leadership understood the potential economic impact of South Korea on the Serbian economy. By 2022, one in every four hundred Serbians will be working for Korean companies. The COVID-19 pandemic was the next driver of increased cooperation between Serbia and South Korea. In April 2021, Serbia received its first set of COVID-19 vaccines from South Korea. Seoul also provided significant financial assistance to Serbia in relation to the migrant crisis. However, as of February 2023, there are no humanitarian agreements between the two countries. This humanitarian cooperation does not lead to increased opportunities, but it certainly improves the awareness of the Serbian population when it comes to South Korea. The issuance of a postage stamp in 2015, marking 25 years of diplomatic relations between Serbia and Korea, has reinforced this awareness.

In terms of investment relations, unlike 2014, when no foreign direct investment from South Korea was recorded, the following two years saw more than EUR 62 million invested, marking the period of the largest inflow of FDI from South Korea in the last 10 years. Since 2016, the volume of FDI has been decreasing, and in 2019 it amounted to EUR 5.8 million. From a reciprocal perspective, there are no Serbian investments in the ROK.

A relatively small number of companies from South Korea operate within the territory of Serbia. The first significant investment relates to the construction of an auto parts factory named “Jura Shinyon” in 2010. There are two additional investments: “LS Group” (wire industry) and ” Kyungshin” (cable industry) launched respectively in 2019 and 2021. Its success would hide the failure of Jura Shinyon which closed its production of car spare parts due to large business losses. “Jura Shinyon” was also not fully respecting its workers as the company forbids its employees to use toilets during long shifts and female employees were even denied break time.

The Serbian government’s strategy is to offer clear incentives to foreign companies wishing to invest in the country. For example, the aforementioned „Jura Shinyon” Jura has invested 60 million euros in Serbia between 2010 and 2021, but almost half of this investment (28 million euros) was subsidised by the Serbian government.

Direct flights between Belgrade and Seoul could also emphasise this economic cooperation. In 2017, the deputy foreign minister of the Republic of Korea, Cho Hyun, emphasised the great interest of Korean companies in participating in the concession of the Belgrade airport, as well as in establishing a direct flight between Seoul and Belgrade.

The spread of the Korean culture in Serbia

When it comes to the spread of Hallyu in Southeast European countries, this region has been a late adopter of the booming Korean culture, mainly due to a lack of interest among the civilian population in each other’s cultures. The COVID-19 pandemic changed the situation, as the lack of physical interactions led to a sharp increase in social networks, which facilitated the spread of Korean culture among Serbia’s 6.7 million inhabitants.The organisation of Korean cultural events in Belgrade, such as the local K-POP festival, has been promoting awareness and understanding of Korea among the Serbian public since 2015. The ROK is also funding Korean studies in Serbia through elective Korean courses at the University of Novi Sad. A university in Seoul, the Hanguk University of Foreign Studies, also offers a degree in Serbian, one of the six Slavic languages available for study. Without Serbian universities offering degrees in Korean studies, South Korea may continue to be perceived as exotic and unknown.

Findings

Despite a limited cultural partnership, there is strong business cooperation, which is obviously asymmetric between the two countries. Serbian investments in the ROK are practically non-existent. The presence of South Korean investment in Serbia could be boosted if the country joins the EU. Serbia officially applied for EU membership on 22 December 2009. Croatia’s entry into the EU in January poses a significant threat to the future of relations between the two countries, as it will undoubtedly streamline investment procedures. Another weakness of South Korea’s presence in Serbia is the small number of its citizens in the country. According to the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, there are sixteen South Korean citizens in North Macedonia, thirty in Kosovo and one hundred and thirty-six in Serbia as of 2021.

From a broader perspective, the South Korean authorities have chosen two countries within the CEE region where they would maintain a high position. The first country is Poland, where South Korea was the main foreign direct investor in 2021. Among the southeastern European countries, Serbia leads in trade with the Republic of Korea, as evidenced by the decline in South Korean exports to Croatia since 2016. The ROK is also Serbia’s third economic partner in the Asia-Pacific region. As mentioned in the introduction of this paper, Poland is losing its strategic position as an outsourcing centre for South Korean companies. The Polish authorities urgently need to understand the reasons for their failure to win public tenders.

Seoul and Belgrade have goals that can be mutually beneficial. Seoul wants to expand its reach to other markets around the world, partly reducing its economic dependence on China, which can be perceived as an authoritarian state. China is a huge economy, but Serbia has an available and growing skilled labour force that South Korean companies can tap into. A second argument is that Serbia has unique advantages, such as one of the lowest corporate tax rates in Europe at 15 percent. Third, there is also an agreement between these countries to avoid double taxation on income. Fourth, in 2010, the two countries signed an agreement to reduce trade barriers for some 2,000 agricultural and industrial products. Serbia and other CEE countries have the strengths and economic potential to help South Korea achieve these goals. On the other hand, Serbia needs foreign investment from developed countries like the ROK to boost investor confidence in its overall economic viability and as a compelling argument for faster EU accession.

On the legal front, there is a compelling case that could potentially shape bilateral interests. South Korean authorities have issued an arrest warrant for Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon, who is hiding in Serbia, accusing him of violating South Korea’s capital markets law. In February 2023, a team of South Korean prosecutors travelled to Belgrade to ask the Serbian government for help in tracking down Do Kwon. The Serbian authorities agreed to cooperate, probably in order to maintain good relations with South Korea. The future of the case is uncertain because, firstly, South Korean prosecutors have so far been unable to convince a court in Seoul that the charges against Do Kwon have merit. Secondly, the lack of a bilateral extradition treaty between South Korea and Serbia could potentially jeopardise the extradition.

From October 2024, the future of South Korea-Serbia relations will also depend on the future outcome of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which could be the start of a wider war. This context would make it difficult to draw any viable and long-term conclusions regarding the Republic of Korea-Serbia relationship. If the Serbian authorities somehow support the Russian authorities, this could also jeopardise relations between Belgrade and Seoul, as EU sanctions could be passed on to Belgrade. This is possible because about 85 per cent of Serbia’s gas supply comes from Russia.

A more optimistic approach could be based on the recent visit of KIA CEO Ho Sung Sing to Serbia in October, where he highlighted not only the improving cooperation between the two countries in the field of high technologies and the automotive industry, but also the growing interest of South Korean companies in investing in the Serbian market. If the Serbian authorities cooperate in the Do Kwon case, it could significantly boost bilateral relations between the two countries, as Seoul could rely on Belgrade in legal matters.

Nicolas Levi

Analyst on North and South Korea. He is an assistant professor at the Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Author of 7 books, more than 20 academic articles, and over 50 analytical reports on the Korean Peninsula, Poland, and related issues. He conducts lectures at top universities in Poland and abroad.

czytaj więcej

Patrycja Pendrakowska and Paweł Behrendt on navigating Sino-Polish relations

We are proud to annouce, that Patrycja Pendrakowska and Paweł Behrendt made a contribution to the latest project of the Baltic Security Foundation, The Jamestown Foundation and the Baltic-American Freedom Foundation.

Will 2023 be the year of improving relations between Albania and South Korea?

In April 2021, the 30 years of establishing diplomatic relations between the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Albania was officially organized in the South Korean embassy in Athens, the capital of Greece. The localization of these official festivities perfectly pictured the nature of the relations between these two countries.

The unification of the two Koreas: an ASEAN perspective

The aim of the paper is to discuss the role of the ASEAN as a critical component of the solution to the Korean unification. The Korean Unification refers to the potential reunification of both Koreas into a single sovereign Korean state led by the leadership of the two Koreas.

The Global Waste Trade: Unveiling Waste Colonialism in Southeast Asia

Although 19th-century colonialism may seem like a relic of the past, the global community continues to grapple with its modern counterparts, often referred to as neo-colonialism.

Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam

Thanks to continuous economic development, Vietnam attracts a record number of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). The catalyst for such a strong growth of FDI in Vietnam is not only the ongoing trade war between the US and China, but also new international agreements.

Navigating tomorrow – the significance of Australia’s navy build-up

Australia has recently announced a plan to build the largest fleet since World War II. This move constitutes another step in Canberra's shift of defence strategy and commitment to adapt to the changing security environment.

Searching for Japan’s Role in the World Amid the Russia-Ukraine War

The G7 Hiroshima Summit concluded on May 21 with a communiqué reiterating continued support for Ukraine in face of Russia’s illegal war of aggression. Although Japan was perceived at the onset of the war as reluctant to go beyond condemning Russia at the expense of its own interests, it has since become one of the leading countries taking action during the war.

China – USA in the South China Sea

The trade war is just one of the problems of confrontation between the United States and the People's Republic of China. Many aspects of this competition coincide in the South China Sea.

Patrycja Pendrakowska as a participant of Women Economic Forum (WEF) in India

The interactive discussion covers recent projects and collaborations which have contributed to a greener economy in India

Women’s liberation in China: interview with prof. Wu Lijuan

Interview of Ewelina Horoszkiewicz with prof. Wu Lijuan - Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology at Peking University. Her research concentrates on the gender issues and social changes brought about by globalization. She wrote a book “Job Placements and Job Shifts in China: The Effects of Education, Family Background and Gender”.

Interview: Why Does Poland Need ‘17+1’?

Interview with Michał Wójcik - Director of the Department of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Marine Economy and Inland Navigation (DWM MGMiŻŚ). In the Ministry, he is leading the  Coordinating Secretariat for Maritime Issues , monitoring the cooperation of Central and Eastern European States with China.

Peace is a precondition for LiFE. How systemic conflicts endanger developmental goals

The G20 can play a pivotal role in dealing with the mounting global challenges by proposing policy coordination and solutions disincentivising armed conflicts.

The dying Mekong and political impasse – an environmental disaster with hydropolitics in the background

The countries of the Indochinese Peninsula are struggling with the problem of the deteriorating state of the Mekong River, which scientists and publicists are increasingly boldly describing as an ecological disaster. Alongside climate change, existing hydropower plants and those under construction in China and Laos are among the greatest threats. These ventures deepen the regional dispute over a river crucial to communities of tens of millions of people.

Historical vs Current Emissions: Towards an Ethical and Political Synergy in International Climate Policy

Environmental problems transcend not only national borders but also historical periods. And yet debates on the necessary measures and timelines are often constrained by considerations of election cycles (or dynastic successions) in any given country.

Saudi ‘Vision 2030’. How the Kingdom is using oil to end its economic overdependence on oil.

With the advent of clean energy technologies the Saudis realize they need to end their economic dependency on oil. ‘Vision 2030’ is a vast and complex plan that seeks to preserve Saudi Arabia’s regional power, economic prosperity, and - not the least - authoritarian rule in the post-oil future.

Short summary of events at the Boym Institute

We want the Boym Institute to become a valuable platform of exchanging views, making valuable acquaintances and, above all, deepening knowledge. Therefore, we undertake the organization of many events: debates, lectures, and conferences.

India’s Expanding Strategic Engagement with Europe

India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, concluded a five-day visit to Europe from May 15 to 20, 2026, covering the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, and Italy. The central purpose of the visit was to attend the India–Nordic Summit 2026, strengthen bilateral and strategic ties with Nordic countries, attract Nordic investment to India, and foster cooperation in areas such as green technology.

Global Gateway 101: A Short Guide to the EU’s Development Initiatives and their Challenges in Asia

The 2010s and 2020s have been marked by intense geopolitical competition, not only in traditional military and economic terms but also in the realm of global development initiatives.

The North Korean nuclear dismantlement and the management of its nuclear wastes

Evidence suggests that North Korea stores its high-level nuclear waste (HLW) in liquid form in tanks on the same site where it is made, and has not invested in infrastructure to reduce, dentrify, or vitrify this waste. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg, one of many aspects of the North Korean nuclear waste problem.

Are Polish Universities Really Victims of a Chinese Influence Campaign?

The Chinese Influence Campaign can allegedly play a dangerous role at certain Central European universities, as stated in the article ‘Countering China’s Influence Campaigns at European Universities’, (...) However, the text does ignore Poland, the country with the largest number of universities and students in the region. And we argue, the situation is much more complex.

Connected Mobility Report

Risk and oppportunities for self-driving vehicles. Exploring global regulations and security challenges in the future of connected vehicles. The report was co-produced by Boym Institute and 9DASHLINE.

Workshop – Liberalism vs authoritarianism: political ideas in Singapore and China

We cordially invite you to a workshop session “Liberalism vs authoritarianism: political ideas in Singapore and China”. The workshop is organized by Patrycja Pendrakowska and Maria Kądzielska at the Department of Philosophy, University of Warsaw on ZOOM.

Globalization of business, education and China: interview with prof. Chiwen Jevons Lee

Interview of Ewelina Horoszkiewicz with prof. Chiwen Jevons Lee on China on globalization of Chinese business education and his thoughts of China’s role in the global marketplace.

Guidance for Workplaces on Preparing for Coronavirus Spread

Due to the spread of coronavirus, the following workplace recommendations have been issued by the Ministry of Development, in cooperation with the Chief Sanitary Inspector. We also invite you to read article about general information and recommendations for entrepreneurs.