
Introduction
Modern public debate requires diverse voices to provide a fuller picture of reality and enhance the quality of discussions. Unfortunately, women remain underrepresented in expert panels, media, and public debates. Their perspectives, experiences, and knowledge are not always taken into account, which diminishes the quality of dialogue.
This guide aims to help organizers of debates, panels, and events create more inclusive discussions where women have a real space to voice their opinions. It includes practical tips on assembling diverse panels, building expert resources, and eliminating barriers that hinder women’s active participation in public debates. Event organizers, moderators, and participants play a key role in promoting best practices and creating a space where every voice is heard and respected.
This guide was developed in collaboration with WICCI’s India-EU Business Council, a networking platform for women in business: https://indiaeuwomencouncil.com/.
-
Planning the Debate
1.1. Gender Balance in Panels and Speaker Lists
- Ensure adequate representation of women in discussions – avoid ‘manels’ i.e., panels composed exclusively of men.
Tip: Some organizations have a rule that their representatives do not participate in debates without female speakers.
- Try to avoid situations where a woman is the only expert on a panel, as this may reinforce her minority status.
- It is not enough to simply include one woman on a panel to check the diversity box. Token representation can reinforce gender imbalances rather than address them. Ensure that female experts are invited for their expertise and given equal speaking time and prominence in discussions.
- If finding female experts in a given field is challenging, search for them through professional networks, universities, NGOs, or available online databases such as the Baza Ekspertek or the India-EU Binder.
- Consider diversity not only in terms of gender but also location, affiliation, and thematic specialization. It is also important to include participants from marginalized backgrounds.
Remember! Diverse voices in discussions enhance your debate.
1.2. Selecting Topics and Language
- Avoid assigning women only to topics related to family, education, or health; highlight their role in traditionally male-dominated fields such as defense, sports, or armed conflicts.
- Ensure neutral and gender-inclusive language – avoid diminutives that may undermine women’s expertise (e.g., using ‘Miss Kate’ instead of ‘President Kate’).
- Keep in mind that gender is not just a binary category – avoid assumptions about gender and pronouns. Ask participants how they prefer to be addressed and respect their pronouns in all communication and event materials. Instead of gendered terms like ‘ladies and gentlemen,’ use inclusive alternatives such as ‘everyone’ or ‘distinguished guests.
- Use gender-inclusive language and consistent titling standards.
Tip: To emphasize the presence of women in discussions, use both masculine and feminine forms of nouns (e.g., experts and female experts) or add feminine endings to verbs (e.g., ‘you were’ as ‘byłeś/aś’). Consider neutral terms like ‘person’ or ‘people’.
-
Moderation and Conducting the Debate
2.1. Equal Speaking Opportunities
- The moderator should ensure that everyone has a chance to speak and comparable speaking time, especially when women are in the minority.
- Prevent interruptions directed at women (‘manterrupting’) and patronizing explanations (‘mansplaining’).
- Allow for various forms of expression – not just confrontational debates but also dialogue-based discussions.
Tip: Encourage contributions from individuals who speak less often by asking direct questions or implementing a round-robin format to foster inclusivity.
2.2. Creating a Safe Space
- Establish clear debate rules and foster an inclusive atmosphere – no personal attacks, respect for all participants.
- Respond professionally and firmly to sexist comments or inappropriate behavior.
- Avoid speaking on behalf of women without prior consultation to ensure accurate representation of their views.
Tip: Avoid proverbs and phrases that reinforce stereotypes, such as ‘it’s a man’s world’, ‘behind every great man, there is a great woman’, ‘strong, independent woman’, ‘ladies first’.
-
Promotion and Visibility
3.1. Amplifying Women’s Voices in Media
- After the event, promote diversity in media coverage.
- Ensure equal representation of women and men in visual and informational materials.
- Present women professionally and appropriately in relation to their role in the debate or event.
Tip: Before publishing media materials, ensure that women are not depicted in a tokenistic way – for instance, featuring a single woman surrounded by men, which may emphasize her minority status. Women should be presented not just as participants but as experts in their fields.
3.2. Networking and Mentorship
- Support the development of professional networks among female and male experts by creating spaces for knowledge exchange and collaboration, such as networking opportunities before or after the debate.
- Highlight the importance of role models by promoting women’s achievements in specific fields to inspire other women to participate actively in public debate.
- Encourage mentorship as an effective tool for empowering women by connecting them with experienced experts.
Tip: Showcase the work of female scientists, ambassadors, or researchers to strengthen the image of women as opinion leaders.
-
Time and Compensation
4.1. Flexibility in Scheduling
- Accommodate flexible scheduling to balance participants’ various commitments, making it easier for them to attend events – for example, allowing them to speak at the beginning or end of a debate if needed.
4.2. Compensation for Participation
- Include honoraria for expert panelists or media commentators in the budget.
- Ensure equal pay for all invited experts, regardless of gender.
- Promote transparent compensation policies by clearly communicating honoraria and reimbursement criteria.
- If financial compensation is not possible, cover travel costs or other expenses associated with participation.
Tip: If the budget is limited, consider alternative forms of compensation, such as media promotion by the organizer, access to exclusive industry events, or invitations to future paid projects.
This guide is based on the experiences of women working at the Boym Institute. It serves as a support tool for debate organizers who genuinely want to increase the participation of women, especially female experts, in public discussions.
The goal of this guide is not to exclude anyone but to strive for equal opportunities in public debate. Inclusivity and diversity are not just matters of fairness but also of discussion quality. We believe that implementing these principles will make debates more valuable, representative, and open to diverse perspectives, ultimately making them more engaging and enriching for all audiences.
Ada Dyndo, Patrycja Pendrakowska and the Boym Institute Team
Ada Dyndo is a seasoned expert on the Indian market, with over nine years of experience living in India. She specialized in bridging Polish and Indian businesses through tailored consultancy services (adadyndo.com). She has held prominent leadership roles, including Head of the Mumbai Foreign Trade Office for the Polish Investment and Trade Agency (PAIH) and Principal Consultant at the European Business and Technology Centre (EBTC) in New Delhi. Currently, she serves as Director of the India Desk at the Indo-Polish Chamber of Commerce and Industry (IPCCI). In 2022, Ada launched the WICCI India-EU Business Council, a platform dedicated to amplifying women’s voices in business. Recognized as one of the Top 40 Leaders Under 40 by the Europe India Centre for Business and Industry, Ada has also been honored with the Women Leaders Award by Her Key. An Indologist with two Master’s degrees and fluent in Polish, English, French, and Hindi, Ada brings a rich cultural perspective to her work. Having lived in Pune, Delhi, and Mumbai, she now resides in Puducherry, where she continues to foster impactful business connections between Poland and India.
czytaj więcej
The countries of the Indochinese Peninsula are struggling with the problem of the deteriorating state of the Mekong River, which scientists and publicists are increasingly boldly describing as an ecological disaster. Alongside climate change, existing hydropower plants and those under construction in China and Laos are among the greatest threats. These ventures deepen the regional dispute over a river crucial to communities of tens of millions of people.
Jakub KamińskiInterview: Why Does Poland Need ‘17+1’?
Interview with Michał Wójcik - Director of the Department of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Marine Economy and Inland Navigation (DWM MGMiŻŚ). In the Ministry, he is leading the Coordinating Secretariat for Maritime Issues , monitoring the cooperation of Central and Eastern European States with China.
Krzysztof ZalewskiAt the Boym Institute we are coming out with new initiative: #WomeninBoym, which aims to show the activity of this – often less visible – half of society. We will write about what women think, say and do. We will also publicise what women are researching and writing.
Assessing the New U.S. National Security Strategy: Key Takeaways on Asia
On 4th December 2025 the Donald Trump administration released the new National Security Strategy (NSS) of the United States of America. What are the key takeaways on Asia?
Jakub WitczakMeeting with Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman
It’s a great pleasure for the Boym Institute to organize an open meeting with dr Uki Maroshek who founded the betzavta method. Betzavta is taught across the globe at the Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace in Jerusalem as well as in other institutions in Europe and the Middle East.
Interview with Uki Maroshek-Klarman on “Betzavta” method
Interview with Uki Maroshek-Klarman - Academic Director of the Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace in Israel. Founder of "Betzavta" method, which was created with intention of streghtening people's participation in society and making conflicts easier to solve.
Patrycja PendrakowskaOnline Course: “Educational tools for addressing the effects of war”
The Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace is offering “Betzavta” facilitators, middle school and high school educators, social activists, communal activists and those assisting refugees an online seminar to explore educational issues related to wartime.
Workshop – Liberalism vs authoritarianism: political ideas in Singapore and China
We cordially invite you to a workshop session “Liberalism vs authoritarianism: political ideas in Singapore and China”. The workshop is organized by Patrycja Pendrakowska and Maria Kądzielska at the Department of Philosophy, University of Warsaw on ZOOM.
Indonesia – between religion and democracy
Indonesia is the largest Muslim democracy in the world. Approximately 88% of the population in Indonesia declares Islamic religion, but in spite of this significant dominance, Indonesia is not a religious state.
Anna GrzywaczThis is the second part of an inquiry into Ulaanbaatar’s winning 2040 General Development Plan Conception (GDPC). In this part of paper, I look into some of the plans and/or solutions proposed in Ulaanbaatar’s 2040 GDPC.
Paweł SzczapChina’s Social Credit System – How will it affect Polish enterprises in China?
The Social Credit System currently being rolled out in China may pose significant organisational and legal challenges for both foreign and Polish entities operating in China. We invite you to read our report, prepared in cooperation between the Boym Institute and Kochanski & Partners.
Patrycja PendrakowskaOnline Course: “Conflict Resolution and Democracy”
The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
Polish-Macanese Artist Duo Presents New Works in Lisbon
Artist couple Marta Stanisława Sala (Poland) and Cheong Kin Man (Macau) will present their latest works in the exhibition “The Wondersome and Peculiar Voyages of Cheong Kin Man, Marta Stanisława Sala and Deborah Uhde”, on view at the Macau Museum of the Macau Scientific and Cultural Centre (CCCM) in Lisbon, from 5 June to 6 July 2025.
Ailuna Shamurzaeva – Research Fellow at the Boym Institute
Her research focuses on political economy, migration studies, and international trade. Ailuna, we are more than happy to welcome you to the team!
An interview with Mr. Meirzhan Yussupov, Chairman of the Board of the “National Company” KAZAKH INVEST” JSC - Member of the Board of Directors of the Company
Magdalena Sobańska-CwalinaDr. Nicolas Levi with a lecture in Seoul
On May 24 Dr. Nicolas Levi gave a lecture on Balcerowicz's plan in the context of North Korea. The speech took place as part of the seminar "Analyzing the Possibility of Reform and its Impact on Human Rights in North Korea". The seminar took place on May 24 at the prestigious Yonsei University in Seoul, South Korea.
Central Asia. The winding road to regional integration
The aim of the paper is to present the current stage of integration among the Central Asian republics and to analyze directions and dynamics of this process in the nearest future. This study also attempts to identify factors which can either slow down or strengthen the process of integration as well as its causes and consequences.
Jerzy OlędzkiThe Boym Institute message to Indian policymakers and analysts
India’s current position towards the Russian invasion on Ukraine may damage its reputation as a major force of peace in the world
Border conflicts as political tools: the Thailand–Cambodia crisis
The border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia is much more than just a territorial dispute. Rooted in historical ambiguities, it has become a tool for domestic political maneuvering in both countries and a stage for international strategic competition.
Andżelika SerwatkaThe Dasgupta Review on Women and the Environmental Crisis
Commissioned in 2019 by the British government and published in February 2021, The Dasgupta Review has been likened to the 2006 Stern Review. Where the latter brought to widespread attention the many failings of the world economy in the face of global warming, the former makes similar points as regards biodiversity – and identifies the unique challenges faced by women.
Dawid JuraszekWe would like to inform, that Observer Research Foundation has published article of Patrycja Pendrakowska - the Boym Institute Analyst and President of the Board.
Patrycja PendrakowskaTaiwanese Perceptions of Russia’s Ukraine war
Since the invasion of Ukraine, the Taiwanese government remained committed to its position of condemnation for Russia, humanitarian support for Ukraine, and deep appreciation and admiration for the Ukrainian people’s will to defy power, resist aggression, and defend their nation.
Kuan Ting ChenA Story of Victory? The 30th Anniversary of Kazakh Statehood and Challenges for the Future.
On 25 May 2021, the Boym Institute, in cooperation with the Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, organised an international debate with former Polish President Aleksander Kwaśniewski (1995-2005).
Adam Institute for Democracy & Peace – Crowdfunding Campaign December 2020
Democracy in Israel is in crisis. And if we don't educate for democracy, it just won't exist. It's that simple. The actual teaching of democracy, on the other hand, isn't so simple. It requires experience, theoretical and practical knowledge and the flexibility to adapt to our ever-changing reality.