2024 witnessed a notable stepping up of Europe’s military profile in the Indo-Pacific. Building on these developments, 2025 should be a year of continuation, bringing even more defence engagement of European states with their Indo-Pacific partners.
For some time now, European states have been dispatching their armed forces to the Indo-Pacific region for missions, sending warships and aircraft for patrols and joint exercises with like-minded countries from the region. However, until recently these deployments were limited, with France and the United Kingdom being the most active. Naturally, the key interests and priorities of European countries lie within the European continent and they did not see the rationale for presence in distant regions. It is only in the last few years that there has been a stronger will to engage in the Indo-Pacific. For example, in 2021 Germany dispatched a frigate to the Indo-Pacific for the first time in 20 years.
However, 2024 was a milestone, with a significant number of European deployments, including some historic ones. Starting with the Netherlands, the Dutch government sent a frigate HNLMS Tromp as part of a 2022 commitment to deploy a frigate every two years. In July, the Italian Navy’s Carrier Strike Group (CSG), with its primary asset the aircraft carrier ITS Cavour, set off on a five-month deployment to the Indo-Pacific, marking the first-ever presence of an Italian CSG in the region. Germany also deployed two vessels (the frigate FGS Baden-Wuerttemberg and the replenishment ship FGS Frankfurt am Main). This deployment proved important as the ships sailed through the Taiwan Strait on their way from South Korea to Indonesia – with this transit constituting the first appearance of German warships in the strait between China and Taiwan since 2002. British and French warships were also operating in the waters of the Indo-Pacific in 2024 – their presence is always partially conditioned by their colonial legacy and global power ambitions.
Having a presence is one thing, but cooperation with partners and demonstrations of unity and strength constitute another. Apart from port visits and independent missions, European navies collaborated with their regional counterparts, holding joint drills and patrols in the waters of the Indo-Pacific. In August, for instance, the Japanese, Australian, French, German and Italian navies participated in a multilateral exercise, Noble Raven 24-3, while earlier in June and July seven European nations – Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, France, the UK and Denmark – took part in the 2024 iteration of the US-led world’s largest international maritime exercise – the Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC). European navies also joined the US Pacific Fleet and other navies on their freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and North Korean sanctions monitoring patrols. A substantial European presence also stood out in the air domain, with quite significant (relative to their capacity) contingents from France, Germany, Italy and Spain deployed for several military exercises such as Pacific Skies 24, Nippon Skies 2024 or Pitch Black 2024. Nippon Skies 2024 provided a platform for German and Japanese aircraft to train together in Japanese airspace for the first time.
European states’ efforts to assert their Indo-Pacific footprint more clearly have been driven by rising regional tensions and a perceived gradual intertwining of European and Indo-Pacific security dynamics. Chinese coercive actions in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, which Beijing has considerably intensified over the past few years, pose a threat to political and economic stability in Asia as well as for Europe. Given the fact that 40% of the European Union’s foreign trade passes through the South China Sea, any potential supply chain disruptions represent a risk that EU member states cannot afford to disregard. Additionally, any conflict in the Indo-Pacific initiated by China, be it in the Taiwan Strait or in the South China Sea, would have a destabilising effect on the security situation in other regions, potentially encouraging other authoritarian and revisionist states to further pursue their territorial ambitions.
Recent closer collaboration between North Korea and Russia, including Pyongyang’s direct involvement in Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, has demonstrated to Europeans (and others) the interconnectedness between the security of two far-flung regions, as it was underscored by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in his latest Financial Times interview. Chinese and North Korean actions erode the rules-based international order, which the UK and the EU regard as the foundation of the world’s functioning.
The deteriorating global and regional security environment has been driving European countries to step up their Indo-Pacific defence engagement and toughen their positions, at least to a certain extent, vis-à-vis China. A good example pertains to Germany, which, although performing a balancing act to maintain good relations with Beijing and secure its economic interests, has been gradually undertaking more concrete actions to contribute to Indo-Pacific security. Through deploying military assets in the Indo-Pacific European states are showing a commitment to the peace and stability of the region. Just as NATO’s Indo-Pacific partners (IP4: Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea) are contributing in various ways to Ukraine’s war effort, European countries are manifesting political will to cooperate on matters of security in the Indo-Pacific. Demonstrating unity and capability to work together on the military level through joint drills reinforces the deterrence effect against any potential Chinese escalation or aggression.
Against this backdrop, European commitment to Indo-Pacific security constitutes a reassurance from the IP4 countries’ vantage point that they can count on their European partners. Though European powers’ reaction to a potential war in the Indo-Pacific is a big unknown, their presence serves the purpose of deterrence so that their readiness to fight does not ever need to be tested. Stepped-up engagement of Asian allies of the US with the European states allows the diversification of security ties, and gives some level of confidence of not being left alone should Donald Trump downgrade the US commitment to its allies’ security.
2025 heralds continuation of European deployments to the Indo-Pacific. At the end of November 2024 the French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle (the only nuclear-powered one in the world beside the US aircraft carriers), together with her CSG, embarked on the CLEMENCEAU 25 mission. French warships, first deployed to the Mediterranean, will then operate in the Indo-Pacific. Another significant deployment may come as part of the annual French JEANNE D’ARC mission, which usually involves the participation of a Mistral-class amphibious assault ship and a La Fayette-class frigate. Moreover, this year will also see the deployment of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales to the region (in 2021 her sister ship HMS Queen Elizabeth was sent to the Indo-Pacific) as well as the first edition of a regular trilateral military exercise involving the UK, the US and Japan.
Nonetheless, there are some challenges related to European engagement in the Indo-Pacific that need to be addressed. Only two European nations have a permanent military presence in the region, namely France and the UK. Others, for example the Netherlands, either send their military vessels regularly but just for a short period of time, or irregularly when they have available assets like Italy. Germany and Italy may have made historic deployments to the Indo-Pacific in 2024, but whether they will be able to consistently dispatch their armed forces will be determined by security conditions around Europe.
Chief of the German Navy Vice Admiral Jan Christian Kaack told USNI News in 2024 that Germany would send forces to the Indo-Pacific every year, but the deployments will be conditioned by future circumstances. European states have limited naval assets and thus capacity for overseas deployment, and their Indo-Pacific engagement potential is further constrained by the unstable security environment around them. The conflict in the Middle East, the Houthi Red Sea attacks, the war in Ukraine and the recent surge of energy infrastructure sabotage in the Baltic Sea necessitate focusing attention and resources closer to home.
Notwithstanding those proximate challenges, Europe needs not only to sustain but to ramp up its Indo-Pacific defence engagement. For that to happen, more European countries would have to recognise the reality and growing interdependence of European and Indo-Pacific security. If smaller countries, even symbolically, joined the European missions to the region and the deployments were coordinated at the EU or NATO level, then achieving permanence and regularity of a European presence on a larger scale could become achievable.
First, however, deeper policy alignment and a united European front with regard to Indo-Pacific challenges, primarily Chinese aggressive and assertive behaviour, would have to be advanced (at least among the states already somewhat committed to Indo-Pacific security as reaching full consensus among all EU member states seems unrealistic given the lack of such agreement even in the case of supporting Ukraine). 2024 unveiled the potential for more effective European military engagement in the Indo-Pacific. 2025 should build on this momentum and bring an even more enhanced defence presence of European states in the Indo-Pacific.
Jakub Witczak Project Coordinator at the Boym Institute. Student of international relations at the University of Warsaw. Member of the Forum of Young Diplomats and founder of the Student Association of Pacific Area States. Research areas include transatlantic security, international security in the Indo-Pacific, international military relations, security policy of Japan, Taiwan, Sino-American relations and history of Asia-Pacific.
Więcej informacji na temat: newslettera, polityki prywatności serwisu
czytaj więcej
The Boym Institute message to Indian policymakers and analysts
India’s current position towards the Russian invasion on Ukraine may damage its reputation as a major force of peace in the world
The number of confirmed executions and frequent disappearances of politicians remind us that in North Korea the rules of social Darwinism apply. Any attempt to limit Kim Jong-un's power may be considered hostile and ruthless.
Roman HusarskiAn interview with Mr. Meirzhan Yussupov, Chairman of the Board of the “National Company” KAZAKH INVEST” JSC - Member of the Board of Directors of the Company
Magdalena Sobańska-CwalinaAfter the darkness of the Cultural Revolution, the times of the Chinese transformation had come. In 1978, Deng Xiaoping realised the need to educate a new generation of leaders: people proficient in science, management and politics. Generous programmes were created that aimed at attracting back to China fresh graduates of foreign universities, young experts, entrepreneurs and professionals.
Ewelina HoroszkiewiczHow China uses its narratives on the Russo-Ukrainian war to court the Global South
Three years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, it is entirely clear that this conflict has irrevocably changed the geopolitical landscape both in Europe and beyond and its repercussions will be felt far beyond the battlefield for years to come.
Konrad SzattersWomen in Public Debate – A Guide to Organising Inclusive and Meaningful Discussions
On the occasion of International Women's Day, we warmly invite you to read our guide to good practices: "Women in Public Debate – A Guide to Organising Inclusive and Meaningful Discussions."
Ada DyndoA Story of Victory? The 30th Anniversary of Kazakh Statehood and Challenges for the Future.
On 25 May 2021, the Boym Institute, in cooperation with the Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, organised an international debate with former Polish President Aleksander Kwaśniewski (1995-2005).
Are Polish Universities Really Victims of a Chinese Influence Campaign?
The Chinese Influence Campaign can allegedly play a dangerous role at certain Central European universities, as stated in the article ‘Countering China’s Influence Campaigns at European Universities’, (...) However, the text does ignore Poland, the country with the largest number of universities and students in the region. And we argue, the situation is much more complex.
Patrycja PendrakowskaSan Zhong Zhanfa or Three Warfares. Chinese Hybrid Warfare
Cognitive operations are becoming an increasingly significant and common element of non-kinetic military operations. States and other political players deliberately manipulate the way their actions, those of their allies and those of their adversaries are perceived by the governments and societies of other international players.
Paweł Behrendt80th anniversary of Indonesian Proclamation of Independence and 70th anniversary of Poland-Indonesia diplomatic relations. April 23rd, at 10:00 am, aula im. prof. Waldemara Michowicza, ul. Lindleya 5A, Łódź.
Book review: “Korean Diaspora in Postwar Japan – Geopolitics, Identity and Nation-Building”
Book review of "Korean Diaspora in Postwar Japan - Geopolitics, Identity and Nation-Building", written by Kim Myung-ja and published by I.B Tauris in 2017.
Nicolas LeviTo free oneself from the Chinese embrace. On Indo-Russian relations with Nandan Unnikrishnan
Interview with Nandan Unnikrishnan, who has served for many years as a correspondent for Indian media in Russia. Currently he is a research fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in Delhi. The interview was conducted during the Raisina Dialogue 2019 in Delhi.
Krzysztof Zalewski“Green growth” may well be more of the same
Witnessing the recent flurry of political activity amid the accelerating environmental emergency, from the Green New Deal to the UN climate summits to European political initiatives, one could be forgiven for thinking that things are finally moving forward.
Dawid JuraszekThe unification of the two Koreas: an ASEAN perspective
The aim of the paper is to discuss the role of the ASEAN as a critical component of the solution to the Korean unification. The Korean Unification refers to the potential reunification of both Koreas into a single sovereign Korean state led by the leadership of the two Koreas.
Nicolas LeviWe would like to inform, that Observer Research Foundation has published article of Patrycja Pendrakowska - the Boym Institute Analyst and President of the Board.
Patrycja PendrakowskaPolish women do not often become the heroines of media reports in Central Asia. In February 2020, however, it was different. The story of Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska, a journalist, "heated up" the headlines of local news portals. More importantly, "between the lines" she talked a lot about contemporary Uzbekistan and the role of women in politics.
Magdalena Sobańska-CwalinaAre “Climate Refugees” (Just) About Climate?
As the awareness of the scale and pervasiveness of climate impacts on human societies keeps rising, so does the frequency with which the terms “climate refugees” and “climate migrants” are being used in the public discourse “to describe those who are being displaced due to adverse consequences related to climate change” (Atapattu, 2020).
Dawid JuraszekOnline Course: “Feminism and Democracy: a Deep Dive”
The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and emerging contractual claims
With China one of the key players in the global supply chain, supplying major manufacturing companies with commodities, components and final products, the recent emerging outbreak of Coronavirus provides for a number of organizational as well as legal challenges.
The Dasgupta Review on Women and the Environmental Crisis
Commissioned in 2019 by the British government and published in February 2021, The Dasgupta Review has been likened to the 2006 Stern Review. Where the latter brought to widespread attention the many failings of the world economy in the face of global warming, the former makes similar points as regards biodiversity – and identifies the unique challenges faced by women.
Dawid JuraszekWhy is stronger foreign investment protection needed in relations with China?
One of the key elements of the protection of foreign investment (and thus the foreign investor) is the mechanism for resolving disputes between the state and the foreign investor. The mechanism itself may take different forms...
Adrian ZwolińskiNot only tests and masks: the history of Polish-Vietnamese mutual helpfulness
On the initiative of the Vietnamese community in Poland and Vietnamese graduates of Polish universities, our country received support from Vietnam - a country that deals with the threat posed by Sars-Cov-2 very effectively.
Grażyna Szymańska-MatusiewiczOpportunities and challenges of India’s G20 Presidency
Ada Dyndo conducts an interview with Shairee Malhotra on India’s role in G20. Shairee Malhotra serves as a Coordinator of the T20 India Taskforce on Reformed Multilateralism for India’s G20 presidency.
Ada DyndoIndia, China and the Shades of Grey
"We are at an inflection point in this century. Many of our traditional arrangements are failing. To achieve stability in this century we need to discover new solutions" - Interview with Samir Saran - Senior Fellow and Vice President at the Observer Research Foundation
Krzysztof Zalewski