Voices from Asia

Searching for Japan’s Role in the World Amid the Russia-Ukraine War

The G7 Hiroshima Summit concluded on May 21 with a communiqué reiterating continued support for Ukraine in face of Russia’s illegal war of aggression. Although Japan was perceived at the onset of the war as reluctant to go beyond condemning Russia at the expense of its own interests, it has since become one of the leading countries taking action during the war.

Instytut Boyma 16.06.2023

The G7 Hiroshima Summit concluded on May 21 with a communiqué reiterating continued support for Ukraine in face of Russia’s illegal war of aggression (MOFA, 2023a). Although Japan was perceived at the onset of the war as reluctant to go beyond condemning Russia at the expense of its own interests, it has since become one of the leading countries taking action during the war (Nikkei, 2022).

As the country holding the G7 Presidency, Tokyo has led calls for Russia to withdraw its troops entirely from Ukraine, impose tough sanctions against Russia, and provide budget support for Ukraine’s reconstruction (MOFA, 2023b). This seeming shift in approach stems from two key understandings — that Russia’s aggression against Ukraine constitutes a serious challenge to the international order based on the rule of law, and that what is happening in Europe may eventually become a reality in the Indo-Pacific region.

In other words, Japan has proactively led the international community in supporting Ukraine because it senses that standing idle during this European conflict does not serve its national interests.

Challenges to the International Order

First and foremost, challenges to the existing international order threaten to destabilize the world in which Japan was able to secure peace and prosperity. The post-war liberal international order propelled Japan to its position as the world’s third largest economy and only Asian G7 member.

Recent developments threaten to undo this. Prime Minister Kishida Fumio has stated that the world faces a “historic turning point” (Prime Minister’s Office of Japan, 2023a). The 2022 Diplomatic Bluebook points out that Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has become a symbol of the “end of the post-Cold War era,” in which authoritarian countries are challenging the existing international order based on the rule of law (MOFA, 2023c). In Europe, Russia poses a threat through its illegal war against Ukraine, another sovereign state. In Asia, China’s military assertiveness and economic heft has left countries concerned about its ambitions to reshape the existing regional and international order in its favor.

In this international context, Kishida has stressed that unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force are unacceptable anywhere in the world and that it is important to maintain a free and open international order based on the rule of law (MOFA, 2023d). The latter was one of two key themes Tokyo pushed forth during the G7 Hiroshima Summit in May. Japan has also championed the “free and open Indo-Pacific” (FOIP) as a grand vision for a desirable international order. The prime minister stated in a speech in March unveiling the new FOIP plan that the concept should be the guiding perspective to avoid the international community from drifting toward division and confrontation (MOFA, 2023e). He added that defending peace is of utmost importance and that countries in the world should be able to enjoy freedom free from coercion.

The situation Ukraine faces today is incompatible with this worldview. Tokyo therefore is inclined to support Ukraine, with whom it also shares a “special global partnership” grounded in fundamental values such as freedom, democracy, the rule of law, and respect for international law and human rights — core tenets of the existing international order (MOFA, 2023f).

“Support Unique to Japan”

There are a few reasons why Tokyo may not have been as proactive about supporting Ukraine at the onset of the war. First, Japan has long sought to conclude a peace treaty with Russia. Although the 1956 Japan-Soviet Joint Declaration ended the state of war and restored diplomatic ties, it failed to resolve territorial issues regarding attribution of the Northern Territories, which remain an issue today (MOFA, n.d.).

The Abe administration in particular put in strenuous efforts to engage Russia and encourage the conclusion of a peace treaty. During his premiership, Japan established a new ministerial position for economic cooperation with Russia and announced the eight-point cooperation plan to deepen economic cooperation, spending close to ¥20 billion (around $140 million) over six years (including years after Abe stepped down; 2016-2022) (Reuters, 2016; MOFA, 2016; Tokyo Shimbun, 2022).

Second, energy has been a headache for resource-scarce Japan. As of 2021, Japan’s dependence on Russian energy was at 11 percent for coal, 9 percent for LNG, and 4 percent for oil (Nikkei, 2023a). Russia constitutes a valuable alternative energy source to the Middle East, which accounts for 80 percent of imported oil (oil accounts for 40 percent of primary energy supply) (FEPC, n.d.). Due to this, Tokyo has been unable to completely cut off Russian energy even amidst the war. The Government of Japan (GOJ) has allowed a Japanese consortium to retain a stake in Sakhalin-1 and -2 in a bid to reduce dependence on the Middle East (The Japan Times, 2022).

There was a clear shift in policy as it became evident that this would be a prolonged war and that this would be the focus of the G7 Presidency under Japan. First, the prime minister’s rhetoric on the war evolved from “serious concern” at the onset to strongly criticizing Russia’s aggression and the “reckless act in clear violation of international law” (Prime Minister’s Office of Japan, 2022a; 2022b). Statements also began to include language that stressed Russia’s nuclear threat was “absolutely unacceptable” especially given Japan is the only country to have ever suffered atomic bombings during war (MOFA, 2023g).

Second, the GOJ began imposing sanctions along with the rest of the G7. To date, Japan has suspended issuance of visas (MOFA, 2022a); implemented asset freezes on 919 Russian individuals and organizations including state banks, 327 individuals and organizations considered to be involved in the annexation of Crimea and incorporation of Eastern Ukraine (since 2016), and 35 individuals and organizations from Belarus (MOF, 2023a; 2023b; 2022); and restricted financial transactions and exports to specific entities and of specific items contributing to Russian industrial capacities including trucks and airplane engines (METI, 2023). It has also imposed export restrictions on dual-use technologies including semiconductors and chemicals convertible to weapons.

In addition, Japan has taken actions such as blocking Russian access to the SWIFT international payment system to make it difficult for Russian companies to do business and imposing a $60 per barrel price cap on seaborne oil to prevent Russia from making money on oil exports (although an exception was made for above-cap purchases) (Reuters, 2022; MOFA, 2022b; Landers, 2023). Separate price ceilings for petroleum and diesel fuel/kerosene products went into effect in February 2023 (MOFA, 2023h). As G7 President, Japan also led the establishment of the Enforcement Coordination Mechanism to address sanctions evasion and circumvention (MOFA, 2023i). One report found that Russia had circumvented sanctions and imported close to $740 million worth of semiconductors primarily through China and Hong Kong (Nikkei, 2023b). The G7 has since pledged to clamp down on third-parties aiding Russia’s attempts to circumvent sanctions (MOFA, 2023b).

Third, Japan began supporting Ukraine more robustly. A recent study by the German think tank Kiel Institute for the World Economy found that, since the start of the war, Japan has committed the fourth most aid — financial, humanitarian, and military — to Ukraine (excluding the European Union) (Kiel, 2023). At the G7 level, Japan announced in February that the members would be increasing their contributions in 2023 to $39 billion and that Japan would be providing $7.1 billion (MOFA, 2023i). It also established the Multi-agency Donor Coordination Platform in January to support Ukraine’s recovery and reconstruction and the G7+ Energy Sector Support grouping to maintain and restore Ukraine’s energy infrastructure (MOFA, 2023j; 2023k).

On the bilateral front, Kishida made a historic visit to Ukraine in March amidst the war and upgraded Japan-Ukraine relations to the “special global partnership” (MOFA, 2023l). Although he was the last G7 leader to visit Ukraine due to security concerns (stemming from a backward rule in Japan’s parliament requiring prime ministers to disclose foreign visits ahead of time), it nonetheless symbolized the heightened importance Tokyo was placing on supporting Ukraine (Nikkei, 2023c).

Given the constraints placed on Japan in terms of weapons procurement, support has been primarily focused on monetary, technical, and non-lethal equipment provisions. Monetary aid can be categorized as grants and loans for economic recovery and emergency provisions. The most notable include $400 million for reconstruction and $70 million grant for the restoration of energy infrastructure, as well as $5 million in agricultural production assistance and $2.57 million for winterization assistance in the electric power sector (MOFA, 2023m; 2023n; 2023o; 2023p).

Technical and other material assistance primarily centered on helping Ukrainian evacuees settle in Japan and providing expert support for necessary reconstruction efforts. For instance, as of May 31, Japan has accepted 2,444 Ukrainian evacuees to Japan (ISA, 2023a). It also passed legislation this month to establish quasi-refugee status for Ukrainians and others evacuating from conflict zones that do not fall under the narrow definition of refugees in the 1951 UN Refugee Convention (Kyodo, 2023; UN, n.d.). This will pave the way for more long-term residence in Japan (ISA, 2023b). Japan has also provided minesweeping training for the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, critical to ensuring the safe removal of Russian-placed mines that have covered area nearly twice the size of Austria (Duzor, 2023). In January, Tokyo facilitated training through the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in Cambodia by local authorities trained by the Japanese in using the latest minesweeping technology (JICA, 2023).

In May, Kishida instructed his Cabinet to consider ways “unique to Japan” in which to promote public-private investment and synergize aid and Official Development Assistance (ODA) use to support Ukraine (MOFA, 2023q). This suggests a shift away from simply providing provisions — including bulletproof vests, helmets, tents, cameras, medical supplies, emergency rations, and generators — toward long-term support (MOFA, 2023r).

“East Asia Could Be the Next Ukraine”

Compared to robust economic and emergency assistance, Japan’s defense contributions paint an entirely different picture. The extent to which Japan has gone is to provide non-lethal equipment including small drones and emergency rations (MOD, 2023a). In March, Japan did provide $30 million to NATO’s CAP Trust Fund, which included the provision of non-lethal equipment (MOFA, 2023m). However, it pales in comparison to other G7 countries. For example, the United States has provided $26.7 billion since the start of the war, including munitions for surface-to-air missile systems, tanks, and air defense systems (DOD, 2023). The EU has provided $16 billion such as through the European Peace Facility (European Council, 2023); individual countries like Germany and the United Kingdom have also provided missiles, drones, and tanks (The Federal Government of Germany, 2023; GOV.UK, 2023).

Japan faces unique, self-imposed constraints on defense exports in the Three Principles on Transfer of Defense Equipment and Technology (MOFA, 2014). Replacing the “Three Principles of Arms Exports” that had been followed for nearly half a century, the new principles announced in 2014 imposed bans on transfers to certain countries, including those involved in conflicts; limited transfers to cases promoting international peace and cooperation or Japan’s security; and ensured appropriate oversight with respect to unintended use and transfers to third countries (Sato, 2014). In March 2022, the GOJ made the unprecedented decision to revise the implementation guidelines — providing details on what was permissible and the applicable oversight procedures — to permit the transfer of non-lethal equipment like bulletproof vests to Ukraine, a country involved in a conflict (NHK, 2022; METI, 2021; MOD, 2022). Since then, Japan has been able to provide non-lethal equipment, including the recent provision of two half-ton JSDF trucks (first of one hundred trucks) (MOD, 2023b).

What prompted Tokyo to increase its defense contributions to a level never seen before? It is hard to believe Japan is supporting Ukraine simply out of altruistic motivations based on a desire to help a friend. The strategic motivation here is that standing by does no good — Japan must make contributions to receive help from others when a contingency occurs in the Indo-Pacific region. For Japan, the paramount challenge is China, which Tokyo characterizes in its 2022 National Security Strategy as an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge to itself and the international community (CAS, 2022). Prime Minister Kishida has hinted at the China threat too, warning that “Ukraine may be the East Asia of tomorrow” (Prime Minister’s Office of Japan, 2023b).

While it would be illogical to draw direct parallels between Ukraine and Taiwan, one can easily surmise that Beijing is watching closely to see how the United States and the rest of the world respond to an egregious case of aggression by a sovereign state against another (Templeman, 2022). Concerns for such aggression are shared across continents, so much so that Japan and NATO have noted that “the security of the Euro-Atlantic and of the Indo-Pacific is closely connected” (MOFA, 2023s).

Given high-level U.S. Military assessments on the timetable Beijing is assumed to be on (as early as 2027 and as late as the end of the decade) for a Taiwan invasion and the fact that Japan realizes the existing Japan-U.S. alliance alone cannot respond to China’s increasing presence in the region, Tokyo has sought to expand its security network of like-minded partners to include European countries (LaGrone, 2021; Shelbourne, 2021). Many of these partners are supporting Ukraine while also enhancing their presence in the Indo-Pacific region. For instance, Japan and the United Kingdom signed a Reciprocal Access Agreement to streamline defense engagements in each other’s countries (MOFA, 2023t). Japan has also increased military exercises and convened “2+2” security consultations with France and Germany, signifying growing Japan-Europe cooperation (Hornung, 2020; MOFA, 2023u; 2021). Finally, NATO is looking to establish a liaison office in Tokyo next year and update their Individually Tailored Partnership Program, symbolizing the importance of Japan as a partner and the increasing linkage between Asian and European concerns (Moriyasu and Tsuji, 2023). A caveat is that Asian and European interests do not always align, as was indicated by France’s hesitation to accept NATO’s liaison office plan (Fraser, 2023; The Japan Times, 2023).

Amid these developments, some argue that Japan must make meaningful defense contributions to Ukraine if it is to expect reciprocal treatment once a contingency in Japan’s neighborhood threatens its security (Itoh, 2023; Nikkei, 2023d). They point out that Japan is likely to run out of ammunition and other provisions once a contingency arises in Asia (Taiwan, to be exact). The ruling LDP-Komeito coalition has held working level discussions since April to consider revising the operational guidelines for the three principles on defense exports, but strong resistance remains regarding the provision of lethal weapons to countries like Ukraine (Matsumoto, 2023). Some proposals being floated include forgoing case-by-case approval of exports co-developed with other countries that the others want to provide to third countries, as well as approving the export of lethal weapons to countries facing invasions in violation of international law (Nikkei, 2023e). So far, opinion polls suggest that the Japanese people have not warmed to the idea, with 76 percent opposing the provision of weapons (Nikkei, 2023f).

Considering the constraints placed on the JSDF over combat, it is understandable that there are reservations about allowing Japan to contribute to armed conflict, which is inherently against the peace-loving nature of the country. However, it would be a testament to Prime Minister Kishida’s forward-leaning security policy and Japan’s understanding of the changing nature of the international order to move toward a controlled regime of weapons exports. Whether Tokyo can get there within the next months is up in the air (Mainichi Shimbun, 2023).

It has, for instance, made some progress on defense export rules, reportedly moving to add land mine removal (possibly Ukraine) and education and training to acceptable equipment exports (Tajima and Uechi, 2023). For now, the GOJ will focus on what it can do — including hosting an international conference on Ukraine’s reconstruction; providing $5 million in emergency humanitarian assistance after the collapse of the Nova Kakhova dam caused severe damage; and potentially supplying 155-millimeter artillery shells to the United States to bolster inventory for Ukraine’s counteroffensive against Russia (Yomiuri, 2023; MOFA, 2023v; Gale, 2023).

Japan will continue to be innovative and lead international efforts to support Ukraine despite structural limitations to its support in certain areas. These untapped areas may gradually become areas in which Japan can contribute given the benefits for its own national security and promotion of its role in the world to maintain and strengthen the existing international order.

Przypisy:

Literature:

  1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023a), G7 Hiroshima Leaders’ Communiqué: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100506907.pdf
  2. 様子見の日本、後追い参加 米欧主導の作業で反応遅れる. (2022), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA2741I0X20C22A2000000/
  3. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023b), G7 Leaders’ Statement on Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100506474.pdf
  4. Prime Minister’s Office of Japan. (2023a), Policy Speech by Prime Minister KISHIDA Fumio at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS): https://japan.kantei.go.jp/101_kishida/statement/202301/_00005.html
  5. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023c), 令和 5年版外交青書: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/100488910.pdf
  6. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023d), Japan-Ukraine Summit Meeting: https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/c_see/ua/page4e_001424.html
  7. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023e), The Future of the Indo-Pacific — Japan’s New Plan for a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” ­— “Together with India, as an Indispensable Partner”: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100477791.pdf
  8. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023f), Joint Statement on Special Global Partnership Between Japan and Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100478707.pdf
  9. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (N.d.), Japanese Territory: Northern Territories: https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/q_a/faq11.html
  10. ロシア経済分野協力担当相を新設、世耕経産相が兼務=菅官房長官. (2016), Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/suga-russia-idJPKCN1173FT
  11. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016), Japan-Russia Summit Meeting: https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/rss/northern/page4e_000427.html
  12. 対ロシア経済協力に6年間で200億円投入…「無駄だった」と官庁幹部 北方領土交渉は停止. (2022), Tokyo Shimbun: https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/167162
  13. エネルギー、独伊は侵攻前ロシア依存 日本は自給率1割. (2023a), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA287YC0Y3A420C2000000/
  14. The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan. (N.d.), Japan’s Energy Supply Situation and Basic Policy: https://www.fepc.or.jp/english/energy_electricity/supply_situation/
  15. Russia allows Japan to keep stake in Sakhalin-1 oil and gas project. (2022), The Japan Times: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/11/15/business/economy-business/sakhalin-japan-stake/
  16. Prime Minister’s Office of Japan. (2022a), フォン・デア・ライエン欧州委員会委員長及びゼレンスキー・ウクライナ大統領との電話会談等についての会見: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/101_kishida/statement/2022/0215kaiken.html
  17. Prime Minister’s Office of Japan. (2022b), 岸田内閣総理大臣記者会見: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/101_kishida/statement/2022/0303kaiken.html
  18. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023g), Japan-U.S. Summit Meeting: https://www.mofa.go.jp/na/na1/us/page4e_001323.html
  19. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2022a), Sanction Measures following the launch of military actions by Russia in Ukraine (Statement by Foreign Minister HAYASHI Yoshimasa): https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press6e_000371.html
  20. Ministry of Finance of Japan. (2023a), 資産凍結等の措置の対象となるロシア連邦の団体及び個人: https://www.mof.go.jp/policy/international_policy/gaitame_kawase/gaitame/economic_sanctions/ukraine_list_russia_20230526.pdf
  21. Ministry of Finance of Japan. (2023b), 資産凍結等の措置の対象となるクリミア「併合」又はウクライナ東部の不安定化に直接関与していると判断される者並びにロシア連邦による「編入」と称する行為に直接関与していると判断されるウクライナの東部・南部地域の関係者と判断される者: https://www.mof.go.jp/policy/international_policy/gaitame_kawase/gaitame/economic_sanctions/ukraine_list_20230526.pdf
  22. Ministry of Finance of Japan. (2023c), 資産凍結等の措置の対象となるベラルーシ共和国の個人及び団体: https://www.mof.go.jp/policy/international_policy/gaitame_kawase/gaitame/economic_sanctions/ukraine_list_belarus_20220607.pdf
  23. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2023), 外国為替及び外国貿易法に基づく輸出貿易管理令等の改正について(ロシアの産業基盤強化に資する物品の輸出禁⽌措置): https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/external_economy/trade_control/01_seido/04_seisai/downloadCrimea/20230331gaiyo.pdf
  24. Takenaka, K., Komiya, K. and Leussink, D. (2022), Japan joins U.S., others in excluding Russia from SWIFT system, Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/japan-joins-us-others-excluding-russia-swift-system-2022-02-27/
  25. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2022b), 外務省告示第四百四号: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/100430153.pdf
  26. Landers, P. (2023), Japan Breaks With U.S. Allies, Buys Russian Oil at Prices Above Cap, The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/japan-breaks-with-u-s-allies-buys-russian-oil-at-prices-above-cap-1395accb
  27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023h), 外務省告示第六十号: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/100454999.pdf
  28. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023i), G7 Leaders’ Video Conference: https://www.mofa.go.jp/ecm/ec/page6e_000329.html
  29. 米半導体、ロシアに流入 侵攻後に1000億円規模. (2023b), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGKKZO70145620T10C23A4MM8000/
  30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023b), G7 Leaders’ Statement on Ukraine
  31. Trebesch, C., Bushnell, K., Franz, L, et al. (2023), Ukraine Support Tracker, Kiel Institute for the World Economy: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/
  32. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023j), Establishment of the Multi-agency Donor Coordination Platform for Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_003208.html
  33. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023k), G7 + Foreign Ministers’ Meeting on Ukraine Energy Sector Support: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press1e_000390.html
  34. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023l), Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/c_see/ua/page4e_001360.html
  35. 国会事前了解なし、首相のウクライナ訪問 与党には電話. (2023c), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA212BH0R20C23A3000000/
  36. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023m), Support for Ukraine through contribution to NATO’s Comprehensive Assistance Package (CAP) Trust Fund for Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_003247.html
  37. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023n), Additional Assistance for Recovery and Reconstruction in Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press1e_000403.html
  38. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023o), Emergency Humanitarian Assistance for the Global Food Security: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press1e_000385.html
  39. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023p), Emergency Grant Aid for winterization assistance in Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_003183.html
  40. Immigration Services Agency of Japan. (2023a), ウクライナ避難民に関する情報: https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/publications/materials/01_00234.html
  41. Japan Diet passes controversial bill to revise immigration law. (2023), Kyodo News: https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2023/06/2332cd3ad280-japan-diet-passes-controversial-bill-to-revise-immigration-law.html
  42. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (N.d.), The 1951 Refugee Convention: https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/who-we-are/1951-refugee-convention
  43. Immigration Services Agency of Japan. (2023b), 入管法改正案について: https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/laws/bill/05_00007.html
  44. Duzor, M. (2023), Ukraine Is Top Recipient of US Mine Clearing Aid, Voice of America: https://www.voanews.com/a/7035800.html
  45. Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2023), 日本の技術でウクライナの地雷除去へ! カンボジアで日本製の地雷探知機の研修を実施: https://www.jica.go.jp/topics/2022/20230303_01.html
  46. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023q), ウクライナ経済復興推進準備会議(第一回会合)の開催(結果概要): https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/erp/c_see/ua/page4_005884.html
  47. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023r), Signing and Exchange of Notes for the Grant of JSDF Equipment and Goods to Ukraine: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_003098.html
  48. Ministry of Defense of Japan. (2023a), ウクライナへの装備品等の提供について: https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/news/2023/05/21a.html
  49. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023m), Support for Ukraine through contribution to NATO’s Comprehensive Assistance Package (CAP) Trust Fund for Ukraine
  50. S. Department of Defense. (2023), Biden Administration Announces Additional Security Assistance for Ukraine: https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3272866/biden-administration-announces-additional-security-assistance-for-ukraine/
  51. European Council. (2023), EU solidarity with Ukraine — Support for the Ukrainian army: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-response-ukraine-invasion/eu-solidarity-ukraine/#military
  52. The Federal Government of Germany. (2023), Military support for Ukraine: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/military-support-ukraine-2054992
  53. UK. (2023), PM welcomes President Zelenskyy to the UK ahead of anticipated Ukrainian military surge: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-welcomes-president-zelenskyy-to-the-uk-ahead-of-anticipated-ukrainian-military-surge
  54. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2014), The Three Principles on Transfer of Defense Equipment and Technology: https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press22e_000010.html
  55. Sato, H. (2014), From the “Three Principles of Arms Exports” to the “Three Principles of Defense Equipment Transfer,” The Japan Institute of International Affairs: https://www.jiia.or.jp/en/ajiss_commentary/column-217.html
  56. 防弾チョッキ提供 ウクライナに武器輸出?. (2022), NHK: https://www.nhk.or.jp/politics/articles/feature/79571.html
  57. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2021), 防衛装備移転三原則の運用指針: https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2021/03/20220308004/20220308004-2.pdf
  58. Ministry of Defense of Japan. (2022), 防弾チョッキのウクライナへの移転に係る審議について: https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/news/2022/03/08a.html
  59. Ministry of Defense of Japan. (2023b), ウクライナへの自衛隊車両の引き渡し式について: https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/exchange/area/2023/20230524_ukr-j.html
  60. Cabinet Secretariat of Japan. (2022), National Security Strategy of Japan: https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/221216anzenhoshou/nss-e.pdf
  61. Prime Minister’s Office of Japan. (2023b), Press Conference by Prime Minster Kishida Regarding His Visits to France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States of America: https://japan.kantei.go.jp/101_kishida/statement/202301/_00010.html
  62. Templeman, K. (2022), Taiwan is Not Ukraine: Stop Linking Their Fates Together, War on the Rocks: https://warontherocks.com/2022/01/taiwan-is-not-ukraine-stop-linking-their-fates-together/
  63. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023s), JOINT STATEMENT Issued on the occasion of the meeting between H.E. Mr Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General and H.E. Mr Kishida Fumio, Prime Minister of Japan: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100453088.pdf
  64. LaGrone, S. (2021), Milley: China Wants Capability to Take Taiwan by 2027, Sees No Near-term Intent to Invade, USNI News: https://news.usni.org/2021/06/23/milley-china-wants-capability-to-take-taiwan-by-2027-sees-no-near-term-intent-to-invade
  65. Shelbourne, M. (2021), Davidson: China Could Try to Take Control of Taiwan In ‘Next Six Years’, USNI News: https://news.usni.org/2021/03/09/davidson-china-could-try-to-take-control-of-taiwan-in-next-six-years
  66. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023t), Signing of Japan-UK Reciprocal Access Agreement: https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/we/gb/page1e_000556.html
  67. Hornung, J. (2020), Allies Growing Closer: Japan-Europe Security Ties in the Age of Strategic Competition, RAND Corporation: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA186-1.html
  68. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023u), The Seventh Japan-France Foreign and Defense Ministers’ Meeting (“2+2”): https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_003254.html
  69. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2021), Japan-Germany Foreign and Defense Ministers’ Meeting (“2+2”): https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_002994.html
  70. Moriyasu, K. and Tsuji, T. (2023), NATO to upgrade ties with Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Nikkei Asia: https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/Indo-Pacific/NATO-to-upgrade-ties-with-Australia-New-Zealand-South-Korea
  71. Fraser, D. (2023), Europe and Asia Remain Oceans Apart — At Least on Security, The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2023/06/europe-and-asia-remain-oceans-apart-at-least-on-security/
  72. France pushes back against proposal for NATO office in Japan. (2023), The Japan Times: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/06/07/national/politics-diplomacy/france-japan-nato/
  73. Itoh, T. (2023), 自衛隊のスーダン邦人退避作戦に見た軍の「貸し借り」とウクライナ武器輸出の関係, Yomiuri Shimbun: https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/column/matsurigoto/20230606-OYT8T50114/
  74. 被侵略国に殺傷力ある武器 政府・自民、輸出緩和案浮上. (2023d), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA075760X00C23A3000000/
  75. Matsumoto, M. (2023), 制約だらけの兵器輸出 ルール緩和は与党内で隔たり, Sankei Shimbun: https://www.sankei.com/article/20230519-AFQ2DFILABOFVBLBC6BNWYRB3E/
  76. 防衛装備の供与、国力と連動 緩和巡り自民・公明初会合. (2023e), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA2435O0U3A420C2000000/
  77. 被侵略国に殺傷力ある武器 政府・自民、輸出緩和案浮上. (2023f), Nihon Keizai Shimbun: https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA075760X00C23A3000000/
  78. 「防衛装備移転三原則」で自公、21日から論点整理 議論を本格化. (2023), Mainichi Shimbun: https://mainichi.jp/articles/20230614/k00/00m/010/329000c
  79. Tajima, N. and Uechi, K. (2023), Japan moving to provide mine removal gear to Ukraine, Asahi Shimbun: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14931398
  80. 日本でウクライナ復興会議開催へ、岸田首相がゼレンスキー氏に伝達. (2023), Yomiuri Shimbun: https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/politics/20230609-OYT1T50181/
  81. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023v), Japan-Ukraine Summit Telephone Talk: https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/c_see/ua/page4e_001436.html
  82. Gale, A. (2023), Japan in Talks to Provide Artillery Shells to U.S. to Boost Stocks for Ukraine, The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/japan-in-talks-to-provide-artillery-shells-to-u-s-to-boost-stocks-for-ukraine-7be5ddf9
Rintaro Nishimura

Rintaro Nishimura is an analyst with the Japan practice at The Asia Group and a first-year graduate student in the Asian Studies Program at Georgetown University's Walsh School of Foreign Service. A native of Tokyo, Japan, his articles have appeared in the Georgetown Journal of Asian Affairs, The Diplomat, Tokyo Review, and Asia Tech Observer. His current research interests are focused on Japan's Indo-Pacific strategy and the geoeconomics of the region. He can be found on Twitter (@RinNishimura) and http://rintaronishimura.com

TAGI: / / /

czytaj więcej

To free oneself from the Chinese embrace. On Indo-Russian relations with Nandan Unnikrishnan

Interview with Nandan Unnikrishnan, who has served for many years as a correspondent for Indian media in Russia. Currently he is a research fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in Delhi. The interview was conducted during the Raisina Dialogue 2019 in Delhi.

Central Asia. The winding road to regional integration

The aim of the paper is to present the current stage of integration among the Central Asian republics and to analyze directions and dynamics of this process in the nearest future. This study also attempts to identify factors which can either slow down or strengthen the process of integration as well as its causes and consequences.

Guidance for Workplaces on Preparing for Coronavirus Spread

Due to the spread of coronavirus, the following workplace recommendations have been issued by the Ministry of Development, in cooperation with the Chief Sanitary Inspector. We also invite you to read article about general information and recommendations for entrepreneurs.

“Green growth” may well be more of the same

Witnessing the recent flurry of political activity amid the accelerating environmental emergency, from the Green New Deal to the UN climate summits to European political initiatives, one could be forgiven for thinking that things are finally moving forward.

Global Security Initiative and Global Development Initiative: Two Wings for Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind

Peace and development as the call of our day again face severe challenges on a global scale, with more prominent instability, uncertainty and complexity

Liquidation of the Polish colony in Manchuria (north-eastern China)

Ms. Łucja Drabczak - A Polish woman born in Harbin, she spent her childhood in China. She returned to Poland at the age of 10. She is the author of the book 'China... Memories from my childhood'. She contacted us to convey special family memories related to leaving Manchuria in 1949.

Development Strategies for Ulaanbaatar According to the Conception for the City’s 2040 General Development Plan – Part 2

This is the second part of an inquiry into Ulaanbaatar’s winning 2040 General Development Plan Conception (GDPC). In this part of paper, I look into some of the plans and/or solutions proposed in Ulaanbaatar’s 2040 GDPC.

From quantity to quality. Demographic transition in China – interview with Prof. Lauren Johnston

What we observe in China is a population reduction strategy paired with the socio-economic transition. In my view it’s not a crisis, but it is a very challenging transition.

Beyond Grey Hulls: Europe’s Role in “Crowdsourcing” Maritime Domain Awareness in the South China Sea

If developments observed in the South China Sea over the recent months are of any indication, it simply means that the situation has worsened. China’s continued aggression towards its neighbors – the Philippines and Vietnam in particular, has continued unabated.

The strategic imperatives driving ASEAN-EU free trade talks: colliding values as an obstacle

Recently revived talks aimed at the conclusion of an inter-regional free trade agreement between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the European Union (EU) are driven by strategic imperatives of both regions.

Young Indo-Pacific: Forward-looking perspectives on the EU Indo-Pacific Strategy

The Boym Institute, working with other think tanks, organizes panel discussions on topics related to the European Union's Indo-Pacific strategy

Are Polish Universities Really Victims of a Chinese Influence Campaign?

The Chinese Influence Campaign can allegedly play a dangerous role at certain Central European universities, as stated in the article ‘Countering China’s Influence Campaigns at European Universities’, (...) However, the text does ignore Poland, the country with the largest number of universities and students in the region. And we argue, the situation is much more complex.

Patrycja Pendrakowska for Observer Research Foundation: “Guiding democracy through Covid19: Poland shows us what not to do”

We would like to inform, that Observer Research Foundation has published article of Patrycja Pendrakowska - the Boym Institute Analyst and President of the Board.

We’re Stronger Together – an Interview with Minister Marcin Przydacz

"Cooperation and investments – we are absolutely up for it. However, we prefer to keep a certain degree of caution when it comes to entrusting the transfer of technology and critical infrastructure to external investors. The security of Poland and the EU should be considered more important than even the greatest economic gains..."

The dying Mekong and political impasse – an environmental disaster with hydropolitics in the background

The countries of the Indochinese Peninsula are struggling with the problem of the deteriorating state of the Mekong River, which scientists and publicists are increasingly boldly describing as an ecological disaster. Alongside climate change, existing hydropower plants and those under construction in China and Laos are among the greatest threats. These ventures deepen the regional dispute over a river crucial to communities of tens of millions of people.

Online Course: “Feminism and Democracy: a Deep Dive”

The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.

Online Course: “Educational tools for addressing the effects of war”

The Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace is offering “Betzavta” facilitators, middle school and high school educators, social activists, communal activists and those assisting refugees an online seminar to explore educational issues related to wartime.

Are “Climate Refugees” (Just) About Climate?

As the awareness of the scale and pervasiveness of climate impacts on human societies keeps rising, so does the frequency with which the terms “climate refugees” and “climate migrants” are being used in the public discourse “to describe those who are being displaced due to adverse consequences related to climate change” (Atapattu, 2020).

Coronavirus and climate policies: long-term consequences of short-term initiatives

As large parts of the world are gradually becoming habituated to living in the shadow of the coronavirus pandemic, global attention has turned to restarting the economy. One of the most consequential impacts of these efforts will be that on our climate policies and environmental conditions.

A letter from the Adam Institute in Jerusalem

This letter is part of our series on the Voices from Asia. We share our platform with Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman who serves as the Executive Director at the Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace in Jerusalem, Israel.

The Boym Institute message to Chinese policymakers and analysts

The EU-China relations require common perspective on Russia’s invasion on Ukraine

Voices from Asia – introduction

We would like to cordially invites all to the new series "Voices from Asia" that is devoted to the Asian perspectives on the conflict in Ukraine. In this series, we publish analysis by experts based in Asia or working on Asian affairs who present their positions on this matter.

Coronavirus outbreak in Poland – General information and recommendations for entrepreneurs

Kochański & Partners and the Boym Institute engaged in delivering information about latest after-effects of COVID-19 pandemia, which has begun to spread in Poland during the past days.

On conflict in the Middle East: Malik Dahlan’s Letter to President Isaac Herzog

This letter has been included into our Voices From Asia series, as we consider it a significant addition to the ongoing discussion surrounding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.