Articles

Time for a new normal – enhancing Europe’s military profile in the Indo-Pacific in 2025

2024 witnessed a notable stepping up of Europe’s military profile in the Indo-Pacific. Building on these developments, 2025 should be a year of continuation, bringing even more defence engagement of European states with their Indo-Pacific partners. 

Instytut Boyma 08.01.2025

warship

2024 witnessed a notable stepping up of Europe’s military profile in the Indo-Pacific. Building on these developments, 2025 should be a year of continuation, bringing even more defence engagement of European states with their Indo-Pacific partners. 

For some time now, European states have been dispatching their armed forces to the Indo-Pacific region for missions, sending warships and aircraft for patrols and joint exercises with like-minded countries from the region. However, until recently these deployments were limited, with France and the United Kingdom being the most active. Naturally, the key interests and priorities of European countries lie within the European continent and they did not see the rationale for presence in distant regions. It is only in the last few years that there has been a stronger will to engage in the Indo-Pacific. For example, in 2021 Germany dispatched a frigate to the Indo-Pacific for the first time in 20 years.

However, 2024 was a milestone, with a significant number of European deployments, including some historic ones. Starting with the Netherlands, the Dutch government sent a frigate HNLMS Tromp as part of a 2022 commitment to deploy a frigate every two years. In July, the Italian Navy’s Carrier Strike Group (CSG), with its primary asset the aircraft carrier ITS Cavour, set off on a five-month deployment to the Indo-Pacific, marking the first-ever presence of an Italian CSG in the region. Germany also deployed two vessels (the frigate FGS Baden-Wuerttemberg and the replenishment ship FGS Frankfurt am Main). This deployment proved important as the ships sailed through the Taiwan Strait on their way from South Korea to Indonesia – with this transit constituting the first appearance of German warships in the strait between China and Taiwan since 2002. British and French warships were also operating in the waters of the Indo-Pacific in 2024 – their presence is always partially conditioned by their colonial legacy and global power ambitions.

Having a presence is one thing, but cooperation with partners and demonstrations of unity and strength constitute another. Apart from port visits and independent missions, European navies collaborated with their regional counterparts, holding joint drills and patrols in the waters of the Indo-Pacific. In August, for instance, the Japanese, Australian, French, German and Italian navies participated in a multilateral exercise, Noble Raven 24-3, while earlier in June and July seven European nations – Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, France, the UK and Denmark – took part in the 2024 iteration of the US-led world’s largest international maritime exercise – the Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC). European navies also joined the US Pacific Fleet and other navies on their freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and North Korean sanctions monitoring patrols. A substantial European presence also stood out in the air domain, with quite significant (relative to their capacity) contingents from France, Germany, Italy and Spain deployed for several military exercises such as Pacific Skies 24, Nippon Skies 2024 or Pitch Black 2024. Nippon Skies 2024 provided a platform for German and Japanese aircraft to train together in Japanese airspace for the first time.

European states’ efforts to assert their Indo-Pacific footprint more clearly have been driven by rising regional tensions and a perceived gradual intertwining of European and Indo-Pacific security dynamics. Chinese coercive actions in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, which Beijing has considerably intensified over the past few years, pose a threat to political and economic stability in Asia as well as for Europe. Given the fact that 40% of the European Union’s foreign trade passes through the South China Sea, any potential supply chain disruptions represent a risk that EU member states cannot afford to disregard. Additionally, any conflict in the Indo-Pacific initiated by China, be it in the Taiwan Strait or in the South China Sea, would have a destabilising effect on the security situation in other regions, potentially encouraging other authoritarian and revisionist states to further pursue their territorial ambitions.

Recent closer collaboration between North Korea and Russia, including Pyongyang’s direct involvement in Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, has demonstrated to Europeans (and others) the interconnectedness between the security of two far-flung regions, as it was underscored by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in his latest Financial Times interview. Chinese and North Korean actions erode the rules-based international order, which the UK and the EU regard as the foundation of the world’s functioning.

The deteriorating global and regional security environment has been driving European countries to step up their Indo-Pacific defence engagement and toughen their positions, at least to a certain extent, vis-à-vis China. A good example pertains to Germany, which, although performing a balancing act to maintain good relations with Beijing and secure its economic interests, has been gradually undertaking more concrete actions to contribute to Indo-Pacific security. Through deploying military assets in the Indo-Pacific European states are showing a commitment to the peace and stability of the region. Just as NATO’s Indo-Pacific partners (IP4: Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea) are contributing in various ways to Ukraine’s war effort, European countries are manifesting political will to cooperate on matters of security in the Indo-Pacific. Demonstrating unity and capability to work together on the military level through joint drills reinforces the deterrence effect against any potential Chinese escalation or aggression.

Against this backdrop, European commitment to Indo-Pacific security constitutes a reassurance from the IP4 countries’ vantage point that they can count on their European partners. Though European powers’ reaction to a potential war in the Indo-Pacific is a big unknown, their presence serves the purpose of deterrence so that their readiness to fight does not ever need to be tested. Stepped-up engagement of Asian allies of the US with the European states allows the diversification of security ties, and gives some level of confidence of not being left alone should Donald Trump downgrade the US commitment to its allies’ security.

2025 heralds continuation of European deployments to the Indo-Pacific. At the end of November 2024 the French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle (the only nuclear-powered one in the world beside the US aircraft carriers), together with her CSG, embarked on the CLEMENCEAU 25 mission. French warships, first deployed to the Mediterranean, will then operate in the Indo-Pacific. Another significant deployment may come as part of the annual French JEANNE D’ARC mission, which usually involves the participation of a Mistral-class amphibious assault ship and a La Fayette-class frigate. Moreover, this year will also see the deployment of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales to the region (in 2021 her sister ship HMS Queen Elizabeth was sent to the Indo-Pacific) as well as the first edition of a regular trilateral military exercise involving the UK, the US and Japan.

Nonetheless, there are some challenges related to European engagement in the Indo-Pacific that need to be addressed. Only two European nations have a permanent military presence in the region, namely France and the UK. Others, for example the Netherlands, either send their military vessels regularly but just for a short period of time, or irregularly when they have available assets like Italy. Germany and Italy may have made historic deployments to the Indo-Pacific in 2024, but whether they will be able to consistently dispatch their armed forces will be determined by security conditions around Europe.

Chief of the German Navy Vice Admiral Jan Christian Kaack told USNI News in 2024 that Germany would send forces to the Indo-Pacific every year, but the deployments will be conditioned by future circumstances. European states have limited naval assets and thus capacity for overseas deployment, and their Indo-Pacific engagement potential is further constrained by the unstable security environment around them. The conflict in the Middle East, the Houthi Red Sea attacks, the war in Ukraine and the recent surge of energy infrastructure sabotage in the Baltic Sea necessitate focusing attention and resources closer to home.

Notwithstanding those proximate challenges, Europe needs not only to sustain but to ramp up its Indo-Pacific defence engagement. For that to happen, more European countries would have to recognise the reality and growing interdependence of European and Indo-Pacific security. If smaller countries, even symbolically, joined the European missions to the region and the deployments were coordinated at the EU or NATO level, then achieving permanence and regularity of a European presence on a larger scale could become achievable.

First, however, deeper policy alignment and a united European front with regard to Indo-Pacific challenges, primarily Chinese aggressive and assertive behaviour, would have to be advanced (at least among the states already somewhat committed to Indo-Pacific security as reaching full consensus among all EU member states seems unrealistic given the lack of such agreement even in the case of supporting Ukraine). 2024 unveiled the potential for more effective European military engagement in the Indo-Pacific. 2025 should build on this momentum and bring an even more enhanced defence presence of European states in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Witczak

Project Coordinator at the Boym Institute. Student of international relations at the University of Warsaw. Member of the Forum of Young Diplomats and founder of the Student Association of Pacific Area States. Research areas include transatlantic security, international security in the Indo-Pacific, international military relations, security policy of Japan, Taiwan, Sino-American relations and history of Asia-Pacific.

czytaj więcej

Why is stronger foreign investment protection needed in relations with China?

One of the key elements of the protection of foreign investment (and thus the foreign investor) is the mechanism for resolving disputes between the state and the foreign investor. The mechanism itself may take different forms...

Temples, Hackers, and Leaks: The Thai-Cambodian Crisis in the Age of Information Warfare

Thailand and Cambodia are caught up in a heated border dispute over an ancient temple that dates back to the 11th century. This isn’t just about land — it’s about the heritage of colonialism, national pride, and tensions between two powerful political dynasties.

How China uses its narratives on the Russo-Ukrainian war to court the Global South

Three years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, it is entirely clear that this conflict has irrevocably changed the geopolitical landscape both in Europe and beyond and its repercussions will be felt far beyond the battlefield for years to come.

The North Korean nuclear dismantlement and the management of its nuclear wastes

Evidence suggests that North Korea stores its high-level nuclear waste (HLW) in liquid form in tanks on the same site where it is made, and has not invested in infrastructure to reduce, dentrify, or vitrify this waste. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg, one of many aspects of the North Korean nuclear waste problem.

“Green growth” may well be more of the same

Witnessing the recent flurry of political activity amid the accelerating environmental emergency, from the Green New Deal to the UN climate summits to European political initiatives, one could be forgiven for thinking that things are finally moving forward.

Young Indo-Pacific: Forward-looking perspectives on the EU Indo-Pacific Strategy

The Boym Institute, working with other think tanks, organizes panel discussions on topics related to the European Union's Indo-Pacific strategy

The Boym Institute message to Indian policymakers and analysts

India’s current position towards the Russian invasion on Ukraine may damage its reputation as a major force of peace in the world

Adam Institute for Democracy & Peace – Crowdfunding Campaign December 2020

Democracy in Israel is in crisis. And if we don't educate for democracy, it just won't exist. It's that simple. The actual teaching of democracy, on the other hand, isn't so simple. It requires experience, theoretical and practical knowledge and the flexibility to adapt to our ever-changing reality.

We’re Stronger Together – an Interview with Minister Marcin Przydacz

"Cooperation and investments – we are absolutely up for it. However, we prefer to keep a certain degree of caution when it comes to entrusting the transfer of technology and critical infrastructure to external investors. The security of Poland and the EU should be considered more important than even the greatest economic gains..."

Searching for Japan’s Role in the World Amid the Russia-Ukraine War

The G7 Hiroshima Summit concluded on May 21 with a communiqué reiterating continued support for Ukraine in face of Russia’s illegal war of aggression. Although Japan was perceived at the onset of the war as reluctant to go beyond condemning Russia at the expense of its own interests, it has since become one of the leading countries taking action during the war.

Interview: Why Does Poland Need ‘17+1’?

Interview with Michał Wójcik - Director of the Department of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Marine Economy and Inland Navigation (DWM MGMiŻŚ). In the Ministry, he is leading the  Coordinating Secretariat for Maritime Issues , monitoring the cooperation of Central and Eastern European States with China.

The Global Waste Trade: Unveiling Waste Colonialism in Southeast Asia

Although 19th-century colonialism may seem like a relic of the past, the global community continues to grapple with its modern counterparts, often referred to as neo-colonialism.

Coronavirus and climate policies: long-term consequences of short-term initiatives

As large parts of the world are gradually becoming habituated to living in the shadow of the coronavirus pandemic, global attention has turned to restarting the economy. One of the most consequential impacts of these efforts will be that on our climate policies and environmental conditions.

Asia-Integration – Follow-up Report on Polish Policy Challenges Towards Asian Countries

The debate was the consequence of positive reactions to the open letter that the Boym Institute published in the summer of 2020. Many of its readers pointed out the necessity of broad consultations regarding the principles of the new multidimensional policy in order to reflect the diversity of perspectives, interests and conditions.

Interview with Uki Maroshek-Klarman on “Betzavta” method

Interview with Uki Maroshek-Klarman - Academic Director of the Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace in Israel. Founder of "Betzavta" method, which was created with intention of streghtening people's participation in society and making conflicts easier to solve.

Charitable activities of the Vietnamese in Poland: their scope and sources

The scale of assistance provided to medics by the Vietnamese community during the 2020 pandemic inspires admiration and gratitude. It stems from the sense of belonging to Poland and deeply rooted in the culture order to help those in need and repay the debt incurred at the time when they themselves needed such help.

An “Asian NATO”: Chances and perspectives

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has reinvigorated NATO. Can the Chinese pressure on its neighbours, especially Taiwan, create an Asian equivalent of NATO?

Patrycja Pendrakowska and Paweł Behrendt on navigating Sino-Polish relations

We are proud to annouce, that Patrycja Pendrakowska and Paweł Behrendt made a contribution to the latest project of the Baltic Security Foundation, The Jamestown Foundation and the Baltic-American Freedom Foundation.

Transcultural Winter School 2021 (8th of November — 12th of November)

This year’s research project TSRG 2021 as a collaborative initiative between Leadership Excellence Institute Zeppelin and the Boym Institute continued with a Transcultural Winter School in Zeppelin University, in Friedrichshafen.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and emerging contractual claims

With China one of the key players in the global supply chain, supplying major manufacturing companies with commodities, components and final products, the recent emerging outbreak of Coronavirus provides for a number of organizational as well as legal challenges.

Connected Mobility Report

Risk and oppportunities for self-driving vehicles. Exploring global regulations and security challenges in the future of connected vehicles. The report was co-produced by Boym Institute and 9DASHLINE.

Book review: “GDR International Development Policy Involvement. Doctrine and Strategies between Illusions and Reality 1960-1990, The example (South) Africa”

Book review of "GDR International Development Policy Involvement. Doctrine and Strategies between Illusions and Reality 1960-1990, The example (South) Africa", written by Ulrich van der Heyden and published by Lit Verlag in 2013.

Book review: “Europe – North Korea. Between Humanitarianism And Business?”

Book review of "Europe – North Korea. Between Humanitarianism And Business?", written by Myung-Kyu Park, Bernhard Seliger, Sung-Jo Park (Eds.) and published by Lit Verlag in 2010.

Beyond Grey Hulls: Europe’s Role in “Crowdsourcing” Maritime Domain Awareness in the South China Sea

If developments observed in the South China Sea over the recent months are of any indication, it simply means that the situation has worsened. China’s continued aggression towards its neighbors – the Philippines and Vietnam in particular, has continued unabated.