
By Nihar Kulkarni & Dr. Uday Patil
The US and China held a bilateral summit on the 13th and 14th of May 2026 in Beijing. The visit was attended by the presidents of both countries, accompanied by the top business leaders, particularly from the American side. By all outward appearances, it was considered a significant diplomatic moment in the history of US-China relations. Readouts from both governments suggest that they have multiple economic agreements and discussed strategic issues of mutual interest. However, something else happened at this summit that deserves far more attention than the agreements themselves.
As the US delegation departed China, footage circulated in the media showing American officials throwing away all the gifts, electronic devices, and souvenirs they had received from the PRC. The reason, according to media reports, is straightforward: due to the high risk of surveillance and digital espionage through electronic devices, the US delegation had decided not to carry a single item or use their own personal devices during the entire visit.
This scenario tells something else about the visit: on one hand, two heads of state shaking hands, business leaders smiling for cameras, and agreements being signed. And on the other hand, behind all of it, a delegation is so distrustful of its host that it discarded every gift upon leaving.
This detail deserves more analytical attention than any agreement signed in the room. It is not a footnote. It is the story. The media, strategic policy circles, and academic commentators have been flooded with speculation since the talks. Some argued that a G-2 is likely to emerge, a new concert of great powers between Washington and Beijing. Others warn of Cold War 2.0. At this moment, it is genuinely difficult to explain or predict the most likely scenario. But one thing is clear: both parties fundamentally lack confidence in one another. The distrust is deep, structural, and mutual. The image of discarded gifts is not a minor detail; it is a window into the actual state of the relationship.
This is why it is unlikely to see the formation of a G-2 so easily. There will be some economic cooperation between these two great powers because trade is too intertwined, supply chains too enmeshed, and mutual dependence too entrenched for a clean rupture. Hence, both will have to cooperate, but this cooperation will exist alongside innumerable geopolitical and strategic frictions. The summit is evidence of both simultaneously.
What we are witnessing, then, is not Cold War 2.0 in a simple sense. It is the return of Cold War logic, but with different characteristics. The original Cold War had its own architecture: ideological blocs, proxy conflicts, and arms races with clear adversaries. This one is different. Two economies are deeply integrated. Two powers that need each other even as they fundamentally distrust each other. The Cold War is at our doorstep, but it will not look like the previous one.
Though multiple media reports and strategic commentaries suggest that the summit was unsuccessful and could not achieve desired outcomes such as accommodating each other’s strategic interests; however, nearly one month after that, on 16th June 2026, the US government made a decision to restore the US Pacific Command (USPACOM) designation, reverting to the pre-2018 designation. This reverse approach by the US could be seen as a milestone in accommodating China’s strategic interests in the region, as we are aware that China has long opposed the notion of the ‘Indo-Pacific’ and ‘QUAD’. Whether this signals genuine accommodation or tactical repositioning, the structural distrust revealed at the airport shows that the answer is more likely the latter.
This phase will be full of recalibration of foreign policy and national security priorities by great powers, and broader changes in global politics. For the world at large, the priority must be improving economic, strategic, and institutional resilience at the domestic level. States cannot afford to be structurally dependent on either pole in a world where great powers are simultaneously competing and cooperating with each other.
For small states, three principles matter above all. First, respect geography, whether you are closer to the US, China, or any other great power; be pragmatic with your neighbours and respect the realities of your geographic position. Second, cultivate regional multilaterals and people-to-people contact, academic exchanges, cultural ties, and joint development projects, because trust built on the ground will prove more durable than any formal agreement on paper. And third, build resilience at home: structural development, stronger institutions, and more capable national systems, so that in times of crisis, countries can absorb the shock.
The US-China summit of May 2026 will be studied for years. Yet the most revealing part of the meeting was not what was signed in the conference room. It was what was thrown away at the airport. That simple act captured the reality of the relationship more clearly than any joint statement. Behind the smiles and handshakes, distrust remains the defining feature of US-China relations, and that leaves little room for optimism about the future.
Nihar Kulkarni is a PhD researcher in International Relations at the University of Warsaw. He writes on the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific region, great power politics, and India’s foreign and national security policy.
Uday Patil completed his Ph.D. at the Department of Geopolitics and International Relations, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, where he was a Dr. T. M. A. Pai Doctoral Fellow. His doctoral research focused on post-Cold War American policy-making towards China. His research interests include U.S. grand strategy, U.S.–China relations, and great power competition in the Indo-Pacific. Dr. Patil has published in Strategic Analysis (MP-IDSA), STSF, East Asia Forum, and The Hindu.
Nihar Kulkarni is a PhD scholar of international relations at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Poland. His PhD thesis examines “the evolution of India’s strategic partnership with Japan in the Indo-Pacific region since 2007." His research areas include India’s foreign policy and national security, geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific region, great power politics, strategic partnerships, and alliance frameworks. His work primarily examines evolving strategic and geopolitical dynamics in Asia and the broader international system.
czytaj więcej
Book review: “North Korean Defectors in a New and Competitive Society”
Book review of "North Korean Defectors in a New and Competitive Society", written by Lee Ahlam - assistant professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Human Resource Development at Xavier University Cincinnati, Ohio.
Nicolas LeviPatrycja Pendrakowska and Paweł Behrendt on navigating Sino-Polish relations
We are proud to annouce, that Patrycja Pendrakowska and Paweł Behrendt made a contribution to the latest project of the Baltic Security Foundation, The Jamestown Foundation and the Baltic-American Freedom Foundation.
Searching for Japan’s Role in the World Amid the Russia-Ukraine War
The G7 Hiroshima Summit concluded on May 21 with a communiqué reiterating continued support for Ukraine in face of Russia’s illegal war of aggression. Although Japan was perceived at the onset of the war as reluctant to go beyond condemning Russia at the expense of its own interests, it has since become one of the leading countries taking action during the war.
Rintaro NishimuraThe Adam Institute invites you to join us for a new engaging course, tailored to participants from Poland, taught on ZOOM.
Reaching for the Stars: Japan’s Evolving Space Policy
From its pacifist post-war origins to an increasingly assertive space programme with growing military ambitions, Japan has undergone a profound transformation in its approach to space policy
Jakub WitczakPaths to Asia: Conversations that Inspire
Wojciech Jaworski is the founder of Huqiao Games, a company specializing in bringing PC games to the Chinese market. A graduate of Jagiellonian University and participant in the “Chinese Bridge” program, he is currently working on a new, as yet unannounced project in the gamedev/tech industry.
Patrycja PendrakowskaOnline Course: “Conflict Resolution and Democracy”
The course will be taught via interactive workshops, employing the Adam Institute’s signature “Betzavta – the Adam Institute’s Facilitation Method“, taught by its creator, Dr. Uki Maroshek-Klarman. The award-winning “Betzavta” method is rooted in an empirical approach to civic education, interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
Will 2023 be the year of improving relations between Albania and South Korea?
In April 2021, the 30 years of establishing diplomatic relations between the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Albania was officially organized in the South Korean embassy in Athens, the capital of Greece. The localization of these official festivities perfectly pictured the nature of the relations between these two countries.
Nicolas LeviRisk and oppportunities for self-driving vehicles. Exploring global regulations and security challenges in the future of connected vehicles. The report was co-produced by Boym Institute and 9DASHLINE.
Coronavirus outbreak in Poland – General information and recommendations for entrepreneurs
Kochański & Partners and the Boym Institute engaged in delivering information about latest after-effects of COVID-19 pandemia, which has begun to spread in Poland during the past days.
Liquidation of the Polish colony in Manchuria (north-eastern China)
Ms. Łucja Drabczak - A Polish woman born in Harbin, she spent her childhood in China. She returned to Poland at the age of 10. She is the author of the book 'China... Memories from my childhood'. She contacted us to convey special family memories related to leaving Manchuria in 1949.
Lessons for China and Taiwan from the war in Ukraine
The situation of Taiwan and Ukraine is often compared. The logic is simple: a democracy is threatened by a repressive, authoritarian regime making territorial claims and denying it the right to exist.
Paweł Behrendt“May you be the mother of a thousand sons” – the status of women in Indian society
The 1950 Indian Constitution introduced the principle of equal opportunities for gender equality, which grants women and men the same rights in family life, political, social and economic life. So why is it that nearly forty per cent of girls aged 15-17 do not attend school, the custom of dowry giving is still cultivated and prenatal sex selection is still a huge social problem?
Magdalena RybczyńskaForeign Direct Investment in Vietnam
Thanks to continuous economic development, Vietnam attracts a record number of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). The catalyst for such a strong growth of FDI in Vietnam is not only the ongoing trade war between the US and China, but also new international agreements.
Jakub KrólczykThe New Trilateral Axis in Asia: What the Pakistan-Saudi-Türkiye Pact Means for India
On 7 August 2026, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Türkiye jointly entered into a defence alliance, known as the ‘Mecca Joint Defence Agreement'. Under this pact, an attack on any one of the three countries would be considered an attack on all three, and accordingly, the three countries would provide each other with the necessary defence support.
Nihar KulkarniWICCI’s India-EU Business Council – a new platform for women in business
Interview with Ada Dyndo, President of WICCI's India-EU Business Council and Principal Consultant of European Business and Technology Centre
Ada DyndoNot only tests and masks: the history of Polish-Vietnamese mutual helpfulness
On the initiative of the Vietnamese community in Poland and Vietnamese graduates of Polish universities, our country received support from Vietnam - a country that deals with the threat posed by Sars-Cov-2 very effectively.
Grażyna Szymańska-MatusiewiczThe link between EU Aid and Good Governance in Central Asia
Nowadays all the CA states continue transitioning into the human-centered model of governance where the comprehensive needs of societies must be satisfied, nevertheless, the achievements are to a greater extent ambiguous.
Uzbekistan, under the leadership of President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, has embarked on a path of reform. Almost daily, the media there report on new initiatives and projects. It is no coincidence that in December 2019 The Economist awarded Uzbekistan the country of the year title.
Magdalena Sobańska-CwalinaThe strategic imperatives driving ASEAN-EU free trade talks: colliding values as an obstacle
Recently revived talks aimed at the conclusion of an inter-regional free trade agreement between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the European Union (EU) are driven by strategic imperatives of both regions.
Robin RamcharanCharitable activities of the Vietnamese in Poland: their scope and sources
The scale of assistance provided to medics by the Vietnamese community during the 2020 pandemic inspires admiration and gratitude. It stems from the sense of belonging to Poland and deeply rooted in the culture order to help those in need and repay the debt incurred at the time when they themselves needed such help.
Ewa GrabowskaAdam Institute for Democracy & Peace – Crowdfunding Campaign December 2020
Democracy in Israel is in crisis. And if we don't educate for democracy, it just won't exist. It's that simple. The actual teaching of democracy, on the other hand, isn't so simple. It requires experience, theoretical and practical knowledge and the flexibility to adapt to our ever-changing reality.
At the Boym Institute we are coming out with new initiative: #WomeninBoym, which aims to show the activity of this – often less visible – half of society. We will write about what women think, say and do. We will also publicise what women are researching and writing.
The Boym Institute contribution to the Transcultural Caravan project
We are pleased to announce, that our analysts and contributors are among authors of the newest publication - "European Perspectives on the New Silk Roads – A Transcultural Approach".