
By Nihar Kulkarni & Dr. Uday Patil
The US and China held a bilateral summit on the 13th and 14th of May 2026 in Beijing. The visit was attended by the presidents of both countries, accompanied by the top business leaders, particularly from the American side. By all outward appearances, it was considered a significant diplomatic moment in the history of US-China relations. Readouts from both governments suggest that they have multiple economic agreements and discussed strategic issues of mutual interest. However, something else happened at this summit that deserves far more attention than the agreements themselves.
As the US delegation departed China, footage circulated in the media showing American officials throwing away all the gifts, electronic devices, and souvenirs they had received from the PRC. The reason, according to media reports, is straightforward: due to the high risk of surveillance and digital espionage through electronic devices, the US delegation had decided not to carry a single item or use their own personal devices during the entire visit.
This scenario tells something else about the visit: on one hand, two heads of state shaking hands, business leaders smiling for cameras, and agreements being signed. And on the other hand, behind all of it, a delegation is so distrustful of its host that it discarded every gift upon leaving.
This detail deserves more analytical attention than any agreement signed in the room. It is not a footnote. It is the story. The media, strategic policy circles, and academic commentators have been flooded with speculation since the talks. Some argued that a G-2 is likely to emerge, a new concert of great powers between Washington and Beijing. Others warn of Cold War 2.0. At this moment, it is genuinely difficult to explain or predict the most likely scenario. But one thing is clear: both parties fundamentally lack confidence in one another. The distrust is deep, structural, and mutual. The image of discarded gifts is not a minor detail; it is a window into the actual state of the relationship.
This is why it is unlikely to see the formation of a G-2 so easily. There will be some economic cooperation between these two great powers because trade is too intertwined, supply chains too enmeshed, and mutual dependence too entrenched for a clean rupture. Hence, both will have to cooperate, but this cooperation will exist alongside innumerable geopolitical and strategic frictions. The summit is evidence of both simultaneously.
What we are witnessing, then, is not Cold War 2.0 in a simple sense. It is the return of Cold War logic, but with different characteristics. The original Cold War had its own architecture: ideological blocs, proxy conflicts, and arms races with clear adversaries. This one is different. Two economies are deeply integrated. Two powers that need each other even as they fundamentally distrust each other. The Cold War is at our doorstep, but it will not look like the previous one.
Though multiple media reports and strategic commentaries suggest that the summit was unsuccessful and could not achieve desired outcomes such as accommodating each other’s strategic interests; however, nearly one month after that, on 16th June 2026, the US government made a decision to restore the US Pacific Command (USPACOM) designation, reverting to the pre-2018 designation. This reverse approach by the US could be seen as a milestone in accommodating China’s strategic interests in the region, as we are aware that China has long opposed the notion of the ‘Indo-Pacific’ and ‘QUAD’. Whether this signals genuine accommodation or tactical repositioning, the structural distrust revealed at the airport shows that the answer is more likely the latter.
This phase will be full of recalibration of foreign policy and national security priorities by great powers, and broader changes in global politics. For the world at large, the priority must be improving economic, strategic, and institutional resilience at the domestic level. States cannot afford to be structurally dependent on either pole in a world where great powers are simultaneously competing and cooperating with each other.
For small states, three principles matter above all. First, respect geography, whether you are closer to the US, China, or any other great power; be pragmatic with your neighbours and respect the realities of your geographic position. Second, cultivate regional multilaterals and people-to-people contact, academic exchanges, cultural ties, and joint development projects, because trust built on the ground will prove more durable than any formal agreement on paper. And third, build resilience at home: structural development, stronger institutions, and more capable national systems, so that in times of crisis, countries can absorb the shock.
The US-China summit of May 2026 will be studied for years. Yet the most revealing part of the meeting was not what was signed in the conference room. It was what was thrown away at the airport. That simple act captured the reality of the relationship more clearly than any joint statement. Behind the smiles and handshakes, distrust remains the defining feature of US-China relations, and that leaves little room for optimism about the future.
Nihar Kulkarni is a PhD researcher in International Relations at the University of Warsaw. He writes on the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific region, great power politics, and India’s foreign and national security policy.
Uday Patil completed his Ph.D. at the Department of Geopolitics and International Relations, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, where he was a Dr. T. M. A. Pai Doctoral Fellow. His doctoral research focused on post-Cold War American policy-making towards China. His research interests include U.S. grand strategy, U.S.–China relations, and great power competition in the Indo-Pacific. Dr. Patil has published in Strategic Analysis (MP-IDSA), STSF, East Asia Forum, and The Hindu.
Nihar Kulkarni is a PhD scholar of international relations at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Poland. His PhD thesis examines “the evolution of India’s strategic partnership with Japan in the Indo-Pacific region since 2007." His research areas include India’s foreign policy and national security, geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific region, great power politics, strategic partnerships, and alliance frameworks. His work primarily examines evolving strategic and geopolitical dynamics in Asia and the broader international system.
czytaj więcej
Coronavirus outbreak in Poland – General information and recommendations for entrepreneurs
Kochański & Partners and the Boym Institute engaged in delivering information about latest after-effects of COVID-19 pandemia, which has begun to spread in Poland during the past days.
Indian Roundtable – Poland’s Challenges and Opportunities in the Subcontinent
In recent years, India has been the fastest growing among the major countries' economies in the world. (...) In the coming decades, the Subcontinent's largest country may remain one of the pillars of global economic growth. This is one of the reasons why the country is already the most popular destination for Polish foreign investment in the Asian-Pacific region.
Nuclear Temptations in an Age of Uncertainty
For decades, the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction was largely confined to rogue and authoritarian regimes. Today, the discussion increasingly includes U.S. allies, signaling a profound shift in global security dynamics
Paweł BehrendtThe 16th India-Japan Summit: What It Means for the Indo-Pacific and the Quad
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi visited New Delhi from 1-3 July 2026 for the 16th India-Japan Annual Summit; this visit followed Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Tokyo for the 15th India-Japan Annual Summit in August 2025.
Nihar KulkarniGlobalization of business, education and China: interview with prof. Chiwen Jevons Lee
Interview of Ewelina Horoszkiewicz with prof. Chiwen Jevons Lee on China on globalization of Chinese business education and his thoughts of China’s role in the global marketplace.
Ewelina HoroszkiewiczBook review of "GDR International Development Policy Involvement. Doctrine and Strategies between Illusions and Reality 1960-1990, The example (South) Africa", written by Ulrich van der Heyden and published by Lit Verlag in 2013.
Nicolas LeviWomen’s liberation in China: interview with prof. Wu Lijuan
Interview of Ewelina Horoszkiewicz with prof. Wu Lijuan - Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology at Peking University. Her research concentrates on the gender issues and social changes brought about by globalization. She wrote a book “Job Placements and Job Shifts in China: The Effects of Education, Family Background and Gender”.
Ewelina HoroszkiewiczRoman Catholic cemetery in Harbin (1903-1958)
First burials of Catholics, mostly Poles but also other Non-Orthodox believers took place in future Harbin in the so called small „old” or later Pokrovskoe Orthodox cemetery in the future European New Town quarter and small graveyards at the military and civilian hospitals of Chinese Eastern Railway at the turn of XIX and XX century.
Jerzy Czajewski“May you be the mother of a thousand sons” – the status of women in Indian society
The 1950 Indian Constitution introduced the principle of equal opportunities for gender equality, which grants women and men the same rights in family life, political, social and economic life. So why is it that nearly forty per cent of girls aged 15-17 do not attend school, the custom of dowry giving is still cultivated and prenatal sex selection is still a huge social problem?
Magdalena RybczyńskaNew Female Prime Minister Faces Thailand’s Political Turmoil
Thailand, known for military coups, political downfalls, and dashed democratic hopes, has a new Prime Minister. Paetongtarn Shinawatra is not only the youngest elected Prime Minister in the country's history and the second woman to hold this post, but she is also a member of the Shinawatra political dynasty.
Andżelika SerwatkaAdam Institute for Democracy & Peace – Crowdfunding Campaign December 2020
Democracy in Israel is in crisis. And if we don't educate for democracy, it just won't exist. It's that simple. The actual teaching of democracy, on the other hand, isn't so simple. It requires experience, theoretical and practical knowledge and the flexibility to adapt to our ever-changing reality.
The unification of the two Koreas: an ASEAN perspective
The aim of the paper is to discuss the role of the ASEAN as a critical component of the solution to the Korean unification. The Korean Unification refers to the potential reunification of both Koreas into a single sovereign Korean state led by the leadership of the two Koreas.
Nicolas LeviRisk and oppportunities for self-driving vehicles. Exploring global regulations and security challenges in the future of connected vehicles. The report was co-produced by Boym Institute and 9DASHLINE.
Patrycja Pendrakowska made it to the Top 40 under 40 Europe-India leaders list
#EuropeIndia40, an initiative of EICBI, covers the stories of leaders below the age of 40 and their contributions to promoting EU India / UK India relations.
Book review: “North Korea’s Cities”
Book review of "North Korea’s Cities", written by Rainer Dormels and published byJimoondang Publishing Company in 2014.
Nicolas LeviPaweł Behrendt for 9DASHLINE: The South China Sea – from colonialism to the Cold War
We would like to inform, that 9DASHLINE has published article of Paweł Behrendt - the Boym Institute Analyst, in which he wrote about history of the South China Sea dispute over the 20th century.
Paweł BehrendtWill 2023 be the year of improving relations between Albania and South Korea?
In April 2021, the 30 years of establishing diplomatic relations between the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Albania was officially organized in the South Korean embassy in Athens, the capital of Greece. The localization of these official festivities perfectly pictured the nature of the relations between these two countries.
Nicolas LeviCharitable activities of the Vietnamese in Poland: their scope and sources
The scale of assistance provided to medics by the Vietnamese community during the 2020 pandemic inspires admiration and gratitude. It stems from the sense of belonging to Poland and deeply rooted in the culture order to help those in need and repay the debt incurred at the time when they themselves needed such help.
Ewa GrabowskaCentral Asia. The winding road to regional integration
The aim of the paper is to present the current stage of integration among the Central Asian republics and to analyze directions and dynamics of this process in the nearest future. This study also attempts to identify factors which can either slow down or strengthen the process of integration as well as its causes and consequences.
Jerzy OlędzkiEnvironmental problems transcend not only national borders but also historical periods. And yet debates on the necessary measures and timelines are often constrained by considerations of election cycles (or dynastic successions) in any given country.
Dawid JuraszekThe countries of the Indochinese Peninsula are struggling with the problem of the deteriorating state of the Mekong River, which scientists and publicists are increasingly boldly describing as an ecological disaster. Alongside climate change, existing hydropower plants and those under construction in China and Laos are among the greatest threats. These ventures deepen the regional dispute over a river crucial to communities of tens of millions of people.
Jakub KamińskiAre Polish Universities Really Victims of a Chinese Influence Campaign?
The Chinese Influence Campaign can allegedly play a dangerous role at certain Central European universities, as stated in the article ‘Countering China’s Influence Campaigns at European Universities’, (...) However, the text does ignore Poland, the country with the largest number of universities and students in the region. And we argue, the situation is much more complex.
Patrycja ZdybelInterview with Uki Maroshek-Klarman on “Betzavta” method
Interview with Uki Maroshek-Klarman - Academic Director of the Adam Institute for Democracy and Peace in Israel. Founder of "Betzavta" method, which was created with intention of streghtening people's participation in society and making conflicts easier to solve.
Patrycja ZdybelTSRG 2021: The Impacts of the BRI on Europe: The Case of Poland and Germany
It is important to contribute to the understanding of what the New Silk Road can mean in economic, political, leadership and cultural terms for the European countries involved. This analysis should reveal the practical consequences of the Belt and Road Initiative for Europe in the case of Poland and Germany, as well as their respective social effects.